期刊文献+

基于合作博弈的供应链伙伴绩效灰色综合评价方法 被引量:2

Method of Grey Comprehensive Evaluation of Supply Chain Partners' Performance Based on Cooperative Game
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对供应链伙伴绩效评价的特点,以灰色理论和博弈论为基础,提出并论证了一个基于Shapley值的灰色综合绩效评价方法。该方法考虑了伙伴各方在群体决策时的合作博弈过程,以Shapley值代表其影响力;同时,运用灰色理论将评价者的分散信息转换为描述不同灰类程度的权向量,减少了信息的丢失,从而提高了评价结果的有效性;最后,通过算例说明了该方法的应用。 In the view of the feature of performance evaluation of supply chain partners, this paper develops and demonstrates a method of grey comprehensive performance evaluation based on Shapley Value. This method not only considers the cooperative game process of partner's decision - making, which Shapley value is used to denote the power of each partner, but also applies gray theory to transform decentralized information within evaluators to vector of evaluation which describes the different gray types. It increases the validity of evaluation results deriving from more information, and meanwhile, numerical example is also considered.
出处 《软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第1期56-59,64,共5页 Soft Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70671058 70702013) 浙江省自然科学基金资助项目(Y6080267)
关键词 供应链伙伴 合作博弈 灰度 综合绩效评价 supply chain partners cooperative game grey- scale comprehensive performance evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Vollmann T, Cordon C. Building Successful Customer- supplier Alliances [ J]. Long Range Planning, 1998, 31 (5) :684 - 694.
  • 2Robinson T, Cousins J. Internal Participatory Evaluation as an Organizational Learning System: A Longitudinal Case Study [ J ]. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2004, 30 : 1 - 22.
  • 3汤书昆,冯建友,张道武.基于合作博弈的知识联盟成员绩效评判研究[J].系统工程,2004,22(4):55-61. 被引量:14
  • 4胡笙煌.主观指标评价的多层次灰色评价法[J].系统工程理论与实践,1996,16(1):12-20. 被引量:222
  • 5Beynon M. A Method of Aggregation in DS/AHP for Group Decision -making with the Non - equivalent Importance of Individuals in the Group [ J ]. Computers & Operations Research, 2005,32 : 1881 - 1896.
  • 6Deng J L. Efficacy of Gray Assessment [ J]. The Journal of Gray system, 1998, 3:244 -257.
  • 7Zhang X S, Deng J L. On Grey Clustering in Gray Hazy Set [J]. The Journal of Gray System, 1995, 4:577 -590.
  • 8姜启源.数学模型[M].第2版.北京:高等教育出版社,2002.363-366.

二级参考文献12

共引文献234

同被引文献14

  • 1谭俊峰,张朋柱,程少川,李欣苗.面向研讨过程的群体成员权重算法[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2005,14(2):97-103. 被引量:3
  • 2赵晓翠,王来生.基于投影寻踪和支持向量机的模式识别方法[J].计算机应用研究,2007,24(2):86-88. 被引量:10
  • 3BADER M A. Managing intellectual property in inter-firm R&D collaborations in knowledge-intensive industries[J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 2008,41 (3-4) :311-335.
  • 4GIANNAKAS K, FULTON M. Process innovation activity in a mixed oligopoly: the role of cooperatives[J]. American Agricultural Economics Association,2005,87(2):406-422.
  • 5MOHR J, SPEKMAN R. Characteristics of partnership success: partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2006,15(2) :35-152.
  • 6LUNNAN R, HAUGLAND S. A. Predicting and measuring alliance performance:A multidimensional analysis[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2008,29 (5) : 545-556.
  • 7GRAVIER M J, RANDALL W S, STRUTTON D. Investigating the role of knowledge in alliance performance[J].Journal of Knowledge Management, 2008,12 (4) : 117-130.
  • 8DODOUROVA M. Alliances as strategic tools a cross--industry study of partnership planning, formation and success [J]. Management Decision,2009,47(5):851-844.
  • 9ATALLAH G. Research joint ventures with asymmetric spillovers and symmetric contributions[J]. Economics of Innovation & New Technology,2007,16(7) :559-586.
  • 10SUH J H, PARK S C. Service-oriented technology roadmap (SoTRM) using patent map for R&D strategy of service industry [J].Expert Systems with Applications, 2009,36(3) :6754-6772.

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部