期刊文献+

基于主观偏好和景观空间指标的农业景观特征偏好模型:以北京市11个农业景观特征区域为例 被引量:13

Agricultural landscape preferential model from subjective preference and spatial landscape index:A case study of the characteristics of 11 agricultural landscape partitions in Beijing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究以北京市11个农业景观特征区域的真实照片为评价资料,通过对46位环境相关专业大学生进行的平衡非完全区组排序评判测试得到他们对不同景观照片的偏好数值。以250m为边长的正三角形在2006年110000土地利用图上截取出照片所对应的数据,根据这些数据计算了反映该照片景观特征的空间格局指数。利用多元逐步回归,以相对应的空间格局指数以及主观判断得到的绿色覆盖度和管理水平等共11个指标,分别针对不同景观特征区域构建景观偏好模型。研究表明,除各指标在权重上的差异外,有些指标在不同特征区域内,甚至在对景观偏好影响的方向上都有所差异:绿色覆盖度、管理水平、斑块黏合度、斑块聚合程度、分维度指数均体现出对景观可视偏好的正向影响,开阔地比例在可视范围体现了对景观偏好的逆向影响,而斑块数量、蔓延度、最大斑块指数、干扰比例和林地比例在不同景观特征分区内则表现不同的影响趋向。 Balanced Incomplete Block-Laws of Comparative Judgement (BIB-LCJ) test was conducted to obtain the people's visual landscape preferences with a preferential-based test for actual landscape pictures in 11 agricultural landscape partitions in Beijing.46 undergraduates majoring in relevant environmental sciences were recruited for the test.For each picture,windows in equilateral triangular shape with 250 m side length were defined to cover different areas corresponding to the visual field.The data from the areas in the land use map of Beijing in 2006 at a scale of 1:10 000 was analyzed using landscape spatial indices.Eleven indices,including 9 landscape spatial indices,level of management and proportion of green,were used as independent variables,and multiple stepwise was used to establish the landscape visual preference models of various landscape partitions in Beijing.The analysis show that green proportion,management level,patch cohesion index,aggregation index,fractal index distribution have positive effect,and proportion of openness has negative effect on landscape visual preferences in the partitions.Patch number,contagion,largest patch index,proportion of disturbance and proportion of forest have different correlations with landscape visual preferences in different partitions.
出处 《中国生态农业学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第1期180-184,共5页 Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture
基金 国家科技支撑计划项目(2006BAJ10B05) 北京市科研项目"都市型现代多功能农业景观特征评价与建设策略研究"资助
关键词 主观偏好 空间指标 景观特征 农业景观 偏好模型 Subjective preference Spatial index Landscape characteristics Agricultural landscape Preferential model
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Shafer E L, Brush R O. How to measure preferences for photographs of natural landscapes[J]. Landscape Planning, 1977, 4(3): 237-256.
  • 2Schauman S. Countryside scenic assessment: Tools and an application[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1988, 15(3/4): 227-239.
  • 3Weinstein N D. The statistical prediction of environmental preferences: Problems of validity and application[J]. Environment and Behavior, 1976, 8(4): 611-626.
  • 4Crawford D. Using remotely sensed data in landscape visual quality assessment[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1994, 30:71-81.
  • 5Palmer J F. Predicting scenic perceptions in a changing landscape: Dennis, Massachusetts[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2004, 69:201-218.
  • 6Hunziker M, Kienast F. Potential impacts of changing agricultural activities on scenic beauty-A prototypical technique for automated rapid assessment[J]. Landscape Ecology, 1999, 14:161-176.
  • 7Franco D, Mannino I, Zanetto G. The impact of agroforestry networks on scenic beauty estimation: The role of a landscape ecological network on a socio-cultural process[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2003, 62:119-138.
  • 8Dramstad W E, Tveit M S, Fjellstad W J, et al. Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006, 78:465-474.
  • 9Swanwick C, Agency C, Heritage S N, et al. Landscape character assessment: Guidance for England and Scotland[R]. Edinburgh: Scottish Natural Heritage, 2002:23-44.
  • 10俞孔坚.自然风景质量评价研究——BIB-LCJ审美评判测量法[J].北京林业大学学报,1988,10(2):1-11. 被引量:177

共引文献176

同被引文献162

引证文献13

二级引证文献111

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部