期刊文献+

腰椎退行性多节段滑脱的手术治疗 被引量:8

Surgical treatment of multilevel lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨腰椎退行性多节段滑脱的手术治疗方法。方法2005年3月至2008年9月,采用后路彻底减压、复位、椎弓根内螺钉固定360。融合治疗多节段腰椎滑脱患者25例。其中男性7例,女性18例;年龄38~75岁,平均56.6岁。滑脱均为退行性变化引起,类型有:前滑脱12例,后滑脱2例,混合滑脱11例。患者均行腰椎后路减压融合手术,术后随访6个月~4年,根据Lenke标准评价脊柱植骨融合情况,根据Henderson标准评价临床疗效。结果术后25例患者均获得完全复位。植骨融合结果:LenkeA级23例,B级2例;临床疗效Henderson评价结果:优16例,良6例,可3例。结论多节段腰椎退变滑脱发病机制和治疗方法与单节段腰椎滑脱不尽相同,后路彻底减压,适度复位,后外侧植骨融合结合椎间融合能获得较好的临床效果。多节段滑脱复位时应根据滑脱的类型选择不同方法。 Objective To discuss the surgical treatment of multilevel lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Methods From March 2005 to September 2008, 25 cases of multilevel lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis were treated with total laminectomy, reduction of spondylolisthesis and 360~ circumferential fusion through interbody (PLIF), transverse process (PLF) and pedicle screw fixation. All cases were followed up for 0. 5-4 years. The Lenke grading system was used to assess the spinal fusion and Henderson grading system was used to assess the clinical outcomes. Results Complete reduction of spondylolisthesis was achieved in all cases. The bone fusion was grade A in 23 cases, grade B in 2 cases. The clinical outcome was excellent in 16 cases, good in 6 cases and poor in 3 cases. Conclusions The pathogenesis of lumbar degenerative multilevel spondylolisthesis is different from that of single-level spondylolisthesis. Complete decompression, reduction of spondylolisthesis sufficient fusion and reliable pedicle screw fixation can provide successful interbody fusion and satisfactory clinical results. It's crucial to reduce multilevel spondylolisthesis by proper techniques based on different types of listhesis.
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第1期26-30,共5页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
关键词 腰椎 脊椎前移 外科手术 退行性变化 多节段 Lumbar vertebrae Spondylolisthesis Surgical procedures Degrenerative change Multilevel
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Sengupta DK, Herkowitz HN. Degenerative spondylolisthesis: review of current trends and controversies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2005, 30: S71-S81.
  • 2Ha KY, Na KH, Shin JH, et al. Comparison of posterolateral fusion with and without additional posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Teeh, 2008, 21:229-234.
  • 3Schaeren S, Broger I, Jeanneret B. Minimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabihzation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) , 2008, 33 : E636-E642.
  • 4Kalichman L, Kim DH, Li L, et al. Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis prevalence and association with low back pain in the adult community-based population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976 ), 2009, 34 : 199-205.
  • 5Don AS, Robertson PA. Facet joint orientation in spondylolysis and isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2008, 21: 112-115.
  • 6Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Rovsing H, et al. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: an epidemiological perspective the copenhagen osteoarthritis study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2007, 32 : 120-125.
  • 7Herkowitz HN. Spine update : Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976) , 1995,20 : 1084-1090.
  • 8Iguchi T, Wakami T, Kurihara A, et al. Lumbar multilevel degenerative spondylolisthesis: radiological evaluation and factors related to anterolisthesis and retrolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2002, 15:93-99.
  • 9Mardjetko SM, Connolly PJ, Shott S, et al. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. A meta-analysis of literature 1970-1993. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976), 1994, 19 : S2256-S2265.
  • 10Fischgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN, et al. 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976 ), 1997, 22:2807-2812.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Schlegel J, Yuan H, Fredricksen B. Anterior interbody operation devices. In: Frymoyer JW, ed. The adult spine. New York: Raven Press, 1991. 1947-1960.
  • 2田伟.使用Prospace和腰椎椎弓根固定系统治疗腰椎不稳定. 全国腰椎外科学术研讨会及学习班论文汇编.太原.2002. 8-10.Tian W. Applying of Prospace cage and transpedical fixation system in the treatment of lumbar instability. National symposium of lumbar surgery .Taiyuan.2002.8-10.
  • 3Biederman L.An engineer′s perspective of anterior column support.The third international meeting on advanced spine techniqures. Germany: Munich, 1996.
  • 4Weiner BK, Fraser RD. Spine update lumbar interbody cages. Spine, 1998,23: 634-640.
  • 5Sandhu HS, Turner S, Kago JM, et al. Distractive properties of a threaded interbody fusion device. Spine ,1996, 21: 1210-1211.
  • 6Brantigan JW, Steffee AD, Lewis ML, et al. Lumbar interbody fusion using th Brantigan I/F cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system: two-year results from a food and drug administration investigational device exemption clinical trial. Spine, 2000, 25:1437-1446.
  • 7Brantigan JW, Steffee AD. A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Spine, 1993, 18:2106-2117.
  • 8Tullberg T. Failure of a carbon fiber implant:acase report. Spine,1998, 23: 1804-1806.
  • 9Hashimoto T, Shigenobu K, Kanayanma M, et al. Clinical results of single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion using th Brantigan I/F carbon cage filled with a mixture of local morselized bone and bioactive ceramic granules. Spine, 2002, 27: 258-262.
  • 10赵杰,王新伟,侯铁胜,海涌,张春才.BAK椎间融合器治疗退行性下腰椎失稳症的临床初步报告[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2000,7(4):346-348. 被引量:19

共引文献1

同被引文献75

引证文献8

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部