整体治理的现实困境与路径选择被引量：11

The Practical Difficulty of the Holistic Governance and It's Path Selection

下载PDF

导出

摘要整体治理理论主张通过功能整合来为公众提供无缝隙的公共服务,但在实践中面临组织整合的技术困境、组织冲突的协调困境以及合作治理的问责困境。解决这些问题需要对整体治理进行改进和提升:要从注重机构整合转变为注重机构协作,营造整体行动的柔性机制以及建设学习型问责制度。 Holistic governance argues that public organization should provide the public with seamless public services through the functional integration, but actually it is faced with the technical difficulty of organizational integration, the coordinated difficulty of the conflict in the organization, and the difficulty of accountability joined - up governance. To solve these problems, we need to improve and upgrade the holistie governance; we should pay more attention to institutions collaboration rather than organization integration; We also need to create a flexible mechanism for the integrated operations and build Learning - oriented accountability mechanism.

作者尹文嘉

机构地区上海交通大学国际与公共事务学院广西师范学院经济管理学院

出处《华东经济管理》 CSSCI 2010年第1期129-132,共4页 East China Economic Management

关键词整体治理现实困境路径选择问责机制 holistic governance practical difficulty path selection accountability mechanisms

分类号 F062.6 [经济管理—政治经济学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献20

1Hood C. The Idea of Joined - up Government: A Historical Perspective [ M ] //Bogdanor V. Joined up Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005: 24.
2Sylvia Horton, David Farnham. Public Administration in Britain [ M]. Macmillan Press LTD, 1999: 251.
3张梦中,杰夫斯特劳思曼.美国联邦政府改革剖析[J].中国行政管理,1999(6):42-45. 被引量：34
4Tom Christensen,Per Lgreid,张丽娜,袁何俊.后新公共管理改革——作为一种新趋势的整体政府[J].中国行政管理,2006(9):83-90. 被引量：254
5Pollitt C. Joined up Government : A Survey [ J ]. Political Studies Review, 2003,1( 1 ) : 35.
6Tom Ling. Delivering Joined - up Government in the UK Dimensions, Issues and Problems [ J ]. Public Administration, 2002, 80(4): 615-642.
7竺乾威.从新公共管理到整体性治理[J].中国行政管理,2008(10):52-58. 被引量：823
8Lda Vincent, et al. Collaboration and Integrated Services in the NSW Public Sector [ J ]. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 1999, 58(3): 50-54.
9Halligan J. Regeneration in an International Context [J]. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 2004, 64 (2): 10-12.
10斯蒂芬·戈德史密斯,威廉·D·埃格斯.网络化治理:公共部门的新形态[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2008:17.

二级参考文献69

1Halligan, J. (2004). Regeneration in an International Context, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 64 (2) : 10 - 12.
2Halligan, J. (2005a). Public Management and Departments: Contemporary Themes - Future Agendas. Australia Journal of Public Administration, 84 (1): 1-15.
3Halligan, J. (2005b). Public Sector Retorm. In C. Aulich and R. Wettenhall (eds.) , Howard's Second and Third Governments. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
4Halligan, J. (2006). The Reassertion of the Centre in a First Generation NPM System. In T. Christensen and P. Laegreid (eds.), Autonomy and regulation: Coping with agencies in the modem state. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar (forthcoming).
5Halligan, J. and J. Adams (2004). Security, capacity and post -market reforms: Public management change in 2003. Australia Journal of Public Administration, 63 ( 1 ) : 85 - 93.
6Hood, C. (2002). The Risk Game and the Blame Game. Government and Opposition, 37 ( 1 ) : 15 - 37.
7Hood, C. (2005). The idea of Joined - Up Government: A Historical Perspective. In V. Bogdanor (ed.) , Joined - Up Government. British Academy Occasional paper 5. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8Hood, C. and H. Rothstein (2001). Risk regulation under pressure. Problem Solving or Blame Shifting? Administration and Society, vol. 33 ( 1, March) : 21 -53.
9Kavanagh, D. and D. Richards (2001). Departementalism and Joined -Up Government: Back to the Future? Parliamentary Affairs, 54:1 -18.
10Kettl, D.F. (2003). Contingent Coordination: Practical and Theoretical Puzzles for Homeland Security. American Review for Public Administration, 33 (September) : 253 -277.