期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

四卡问题的新视角——社会契约理论 被引量：1

A New Perspective of Wason Selection Task:the Social Contract Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Cosmides所提出的社会契约理论表明,人的推理能力具有领域特殊性的和内容依赖性。这不仅挑战了传统的推理假设,更以一种超越常规的方式促进了心理学特别是认知和发展心理学的发展。 Cosmides proposed social contract theory,which suggested that a person s reasoning ability possessed a domain-specific and contents-dependent.This point not only challenged the traditional hypothesis of reasoning,but also promoted the development of psychology beyond conventionality,especially the cognitive psychology and developmental psychology.
作者 王丽梅 高华
机构地区 福建师范大学教育科学与技术学院
出处 《长春师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》 2010年第1期10-14,共5页 Journal of Changchun Teachers Coliege
基金 福建省社会科学规划项目(2008B2008) 福建省教育厅A类项目(JA08061S)
关键词 四卡问题 进化心理学 社会契约理论 觉察欺骗者 Wason selection task evolutionary psychology social contract theory cheater detection
分类号 B884 [哲学宗教]
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Keith Stenning and Michiel van Lambalgen(2008). Human reasoning and cognitive science[ M]. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • 2Griggs, R. A. and Cox, J. R. (1982). The elusive thematie - materials effect in wason' s selection task. British Journal of Psychology,73: 407 - 420.
  • 3Wason,P. and Johnson- Laird,P. (1972).Psychology of Reasonlng:Structure and Content. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.
  • 4傅庆芳.推理能力与逻辑规则——“沃森选择任务”论争的辨析[J].自然辩证法研究,2005,21(8):29-32. 被引量：5
  • 5张勇,熊哲宏.“觉察欺骗者模块”:推理的领域特殊性[J].华东师范大学学报（教育科学版）,2005,23(4):47-52. 被引量：9
  • 6Leda Cosmides & John Tooby(2006). Evolutionary psychology: A Primer, Center for Evolutionary Psychology, University of Califonnia Santa Barbara, http://www, psych, ucsb. edu/research/cep/primer, html.
  • 7Cosmides, L. (1985). Deduction or Darwinian algorithms? An explanation of the elusive content effect on the Wason selection task. Doetoral Dissertation, Department of Psychology, Harvard University. (University Microfilms No. 86 - 02206).
  • 8Cosmides,L.& Tooby,J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social e.xchange.In J.Barkow,L.Cosmides,& J.Tooby (Eda.),The adapted mind[ M] ( pp. 163 - 228). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 9S. Baron- Cohen,A.M.Leslie,U. Frith (1985).Does the autistic child have a "theory of mind"?, Cognition 21,pp.37-46.
  • 10Laurence Fiddick, Leda Cosnfides, John Tooby (2000). No interpretation without representation:the role of domainspecific rcpresemtations and inferences in the Wason selection task, Cognition 77, pp1 -79.

二级参考文献19

  • 1熊哲宏,王中杰.论高级认知系统的模块性——对J·福多“中心系统的非模块性”论证的反驳[J].湖南师范大学教育科学学报,2004,3(5):104-109. 被引量：5
  • 2(美)理查德·格里格 菲利普·津巴多.心理学与生活[M].北京:人民邮电出版社,2003..
  • 3The Wason Selection Task Due to P. C. Wason 1966 [ EB/OL ]. www. mat hs. qmul. ac. uk/wilfrid/logic/bwason. pdf.2005 - 01 - 04.
  • 4The Wason Selection Task[EB/OL]. http://www, stanford.edu/elass/symbsys100/lectures/Lec7.pdf. 2005 - 01 - 04.
  • 5The Wason Selection Task [ EB/OL] . http://www. psych. ucsb. edu/research/cep/socex/wason. htm. 2005 - 01 - 04.
  • 6John L Taylor. Evolutionary Psychology: Objections and Replies [ EB/OL ] . http://www. crumpled. com/cp/personal/ep. html.2005 - 01 - 04.
  • 7Petra Hendriks. The Problem with Logic in the Logical Problem of Language Acquisition [ EB/OL] . http://www, ires. upenn. edu/eogsci2000/PRCDNGS/SPRCDNGS/PAPERS/HENDRICK. PDF. 2005 - 01 - 04.
  • 8Margolis, Howard. Wason's Selection Task With a Reduced Array ( 1 ) [ EB/OL ] .http://psycprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/archive/00000108/. 2005 - 01 - 04.
  • 9Margolis, Howard. More on Modus Tollens and the Wason Task ( 6 ) [ EB/OL ] . http://psycprints. ecs. soton.ac. uk/archive/00000139/. 2005 - 01 - 04.
  • 10王培.Wason''s Cards: What is Wrong [EB/OL].http:// www. cogsci. indiana. edu/farg/peiwang/PUBLICATION/wang. evidence. pdf,2005-01-04.

共引文献12

同被引文献128

  • 1Barclay, P., & Lalumiere, M. L. (2006). Do people differentially remember cheaters? Human Nature, 17, 98-113.
  • 2Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2010). Justice sensitivity and source memory for cheaters. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 677-683.
  • 3Bell, R.,& Buchner, A. (2011). Source memory for faces is determined by their emotional evaluation. Emotion, 11, 249-261.
  • 4Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2012). How adaptive is memory for cheaters? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 403408.
  • 5Bell, R., Buchner, A., Drdfelder, E.,Giang, T.,Schain, C., & Riether, N. (2012). How specific is source memory for faces of cheaters? Evidence for categorical emotional tagging. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 457-472.
  • 6Bell, R., Buchner, A., Kroneisen, M., & Giang, T. (2012). On the flexibility of social source memory: A test of the emotional incongruity hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1512-1529.
  • 7Bell, R., Buchner, A., & Musch, J. (2010). Enhanced old-new recognition and source memory for faces of cooperators and defectors in a social-dilemma game. Cognition, 117, 261-275.
  • 8Beller, S. (2010). Deontic reasoning reviewed: Psychological questions, empirical findings, and current theories. Cognitive Processing, 11, 123-132.
  • 9Bond, C. F” Jr” Berry, D. S” & Omar, A. (1994). The kernel of truth in judgments of deceptiveness. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 523-534.
  • 10Bonnefon, J.-F.,Hopfensitz, A.,& De Neys,W. (2013). The modular nature of trustworthiness detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 143-150.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

长春师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）
2010年 第1期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部