期刊文献+

贤人之治的当代民主嬗变

The Contemporary Democratic Evolution of Ruling by Sages
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从本质上看,贤人之治是一种"精英专政",在历史进程中衍生出政治的宗法化、道德化倾向,展露了其政治哲学的工具化、实用化特征,反映了传统儒学社会"公"领域的缺陷,因此与当代民主行政的核心价值相异。目前我国的民主治道变革面临双重任务:一方面,从贤人之治的传统德治主义向理性官僚制的范式变迁是民主转型的前提。另一方面,面对"后官僚时代"的挑战,治理者还须积极回应公民参与、理性行政、多元治理、公共利益等民主治理的诉求,只有这样,适合我国民主行政发育的道德生态才能孕育而生,儒学政治文明也才能在全球化时代焕发新的生命力。 In essence, ruling by sages is a "dictatorship of the elite". In the historical process there is a tendency for politics to be patriarchal and moral and the political philosophy has the instrumental and practical features, which reflects the defects of the tradi- tional Confucians in the society's "public" areas and differs from the core values of modem democratic administration. At present, China's democratic governance reforms face the double tasks: on the one hand, paradigm changes from traditional moral doctrine with ruling by sages to the rational bureaucratic system are the premise of democratic transition. On the other hand, in the face with challenges of "post-bureaucratic era", managers must respond positively to citizen participation, rational administration, multi-governance, the public interest demands and other appeals for democratic governance. Only in this way can the moral ecology suitable for China's development of democratic administration be created and will Confucianism's political philosophy display a new vitality in the era of globalization.
作者 高猛 许烽
出处 《浙江海洋学院学报(人文科学版)》 2009年第4期65-69,共5页 Journal of Zhejiang Ocean University(Humane Science)
基金 河南省廉政评价研究中心2009年重点课题"儒家文化转型与腐败治理研究"(编号:2009A08)的阶段成果
关键词 贤人之治 民主嬗变 儒家 ruling by sages democratic evolution Confucian
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1赵杰.走出“贤人政治”观念的误区─—试论中国传统“贤人政治”观念的局限及启示[J].宁夏党校学报,1999,1(1):56-59. 被引量:2
  • 2Tu Wei-ming. Confucian Traditions in East Asian Modernity[M]. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1996:7.
  • 3贝淡宁.二十一世纪的儒教民主制[C]//刘军宁,王炎,刘小枫,等.自由与社群.北京:三联书店,1998:379.
  • 4Benjamin Schwartz. Some Polaritiesin Confucian Thought[C]//D. Nevinson. Confucianism in Action. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1960:53.
  • 5梁启超.先秦政治思想史[M].北京:东方出版社,1996.104.
  • 6陈独秀.再答常乃德[C]//独秀文存:第3卷.合肥:安徽人民出版社,1987:649.
  • 7明思溥.中国人的素质[M].上海:学林出版社,2001:23.
  • 8Barber, B. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age[M].Berkeley: Universty of California Press, 1986:262-311.
  • 9汉密尔顿.联邦党人文集[C].北京:商务印书馆,1980.264.
  • 10汉娜·阿伦特.公共领域和私人领域[c]//汪晖,陈燕谷.文化与公共性.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2005.

共引文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部