摘要
目的:比较尼美舒利和萘普生治疗骨关节炎的疗效和安全性。方法:采用随机、双盲或单盲、多中心、对照研究方法。尼美舒利100例(男性41例,女性59例,年龄54±s10a),萘普生68例(男性29例,女性39例,年龄53±12a)。尼美舒利口服100mg,bid;萘普生口服250mg,bid,疗程2wk。结果:尼美舒利的总有效率为83%,萘普生的总有效率为75%(P<0.05)。不良反应发生率分别为23%和32%(P>0.05),以胃肠反应为主。结论:尼美舒利对骨关节炎治疗作用优于萘普生,不良反应发生率与萘普生相近。
AIM: To compare the therapeutic effects and safety of nimesulide and naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthritis. METHODS: In the randomized, double or single_blind, paralleled and multi_center studies, 100 patients (M 41, F 59, age 54±s 10 a) were given nimesulide 100 mg po, bid for 2 wk and 68 patients (M 29, F 39, age 53±12 a) were given naproxen 250 mg po, bid for 2 wk. RESULTS: Both nimesulide and naproxen improved the inflammatory signs and symptoms of patients with to_ tal effective rates 83% and 75% respectively (P< 0.05) and adverse reaction rates of 23% and 32% respectively (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Nimesulide is more effective than naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthritis with similar adverse reaction.
出处
《中国新药与临床杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
1998年第5期259-261,共3页
Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies
关键词
尼美舒利
萘普生
骨关节炎
药物疗法
Nimesulide
naproxen
osteoarthritis
multicenter studies