期刊文献+

多奈哌齐治疗卒中后失语的疗效观察 被引量:15

The efficacy of donepezil for post-stroke aphasia: a pilot case control study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价多奈哌齐治疗急性卒中后失语的疗效。方法将60例急性卒中后失语患者分为治疗组和对照组。所有患者接受规范化的脑血管病治疗,治疗组加用盐酸多奈哌齐5mg/d,共12周。采用西部失语成套测验(WAB)评定疗效。结果12周后,两组患者的WAB各亚项及失语指数(AQ)得分均较基线值有显著地提高,但治疗组的AQ改善程度得分比对照组更为显著[(34.14±17.70)分比(20.69±17.26)分,P=0.004];治疗组在自发言语、听理解、复述和命名各方面的改善程度均大于对照组,达到统计学意义(P〈0.05);治疗组中有明显临床改善的患者达60%,而对照组仅为26.7%,差异显著(P=0.009)。结论卒中后3个月内失语患者有不同程度的自然恢复,加用多奈哌齐对自发言语、听理解、复述、命名的恢复可能有促进作用。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy of donepezil for post-stroke aphasia. Methods Sixty patients with acute post-stroke aphasia were divided into treatment group and a control group. All patients had been treated for secondary prevention according to the guideline. The treatment group received donepezil hydrochloride (5 mg/d) for 12 weeks. The efficacy of treatment was measured by comparing the changes of scores of Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) between baseline and 12 weeks later. Results Compared with the baseline, the changes of scores of all items of WAB and Aphasia Quotient (AQ) in both group after 12 weeks follow-up were great, however, the change of AQ was significantly greater in donepezil group (34. 14 -± 17.70) than that in control group (20. 69 ± 17.26) (P =0. 004). The patients in donepezil group also showed significant recovery in spontaneous speech, comprehension, repetition, and naming than those in control group ( P 〈 0. 05 ). The rate of significant improving in donepezil group was 60. 0% which was significantly greater than that in control group ( 26. 7% ) ( P = 0. 009 ). Conclusion There are spontaneous recovery of post-stroke aphasia within 3 months. Donepezil may facilitate the recovery in spontaneous speech, comprehension ,repetition, and naming functions.
出处 《中华内科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第2期115-118,共4页 Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine
关键词 卒中 失语症 多奈哌齐 Stroke Aphasia Donepezil
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Brust JC, Shafer SQ, Richter RW, et al. Aphasia in acute stroke. Stroke, 1976,7 : 167-174.
  • 2Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, et al. Aphasia in acute stroke : incidence, determinants, and recovery. Ann Neurol, 1995,38:659-666.
  • 3Robey RR. The efficacy of treatment for aphasic persons : a meta- analysis. Brain Lang, 1994,47:582-608.
  • 4Bhogal SK, Teasell R, Speechley M. Intensity of aphasia therapy, impact on recovery. Stroke ,2003,34:987-993.
  • 5各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379-380. 被引量:33020
  • 6Wade DT, Hewer RL, David RM, et al. Aphasia after stroke: natural history and associated deficits. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1986,49 : 11-16.
  • 7Hillis AE. Mechanisms of early aphasia. Aphasiology, 2002,16 : 897-901.
  • 8Cappa SF, Perani D, Grassi F, et al. A PET follow-up study of recovery after stroke in acute aphasics. Brain Lang, 1997,56:55- 67.
  • 9Cao Y, Vikingstad EM, George KP, et al. Cortical language activation in stroke patients recovering from aphasia with functional MRI. Stroke, 1999,30:2331-2340.
  • 10Mimura M, Kato M, Kato M, et al. Prospective and retrospective studies of recovery in aphasia. Changes in cerebral blood flow and language functions. Brain, 1998,121 ( Pt 11 ) :2083-2094.

共引文献33019

同被引文献227

引证文献15

二级引证文献89

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部