2Islamoglu K, Coskunfirat OK, Tctik G, et al. Complications and removal rates of miniplates and screws used for maxillofacial fractures. Ann Plast Surg, 2002, 48(3) : 265 -268.
3Perren SM, Cordey J, Rahn BA, et al. Early temporary porosis of bone induced by internal fixation implants. A reaction to necrosis, not to stress protection? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1988, (232) : 139 -151.
4Be'ery-Lipperman M, Gefen A. A method of quantification of stress shielding in the proximal femur using hierarchical computational modeling. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin, 2006, 9(1) : 35 -44.
6Giesen EB, Ding M, Dalstra M, et al. Reduced mechanical load decreases the density, stiffness, and strength of cancellous bone of the mandibular condyle. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2003, 18 (4) : 358 -363.
9Kennady MC, Tucker MR, Lester GE, et al. Histomorphometric evaluation of stress shielding in mandibular continuity defects treated with rigid fixation plates and bone grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1989, 18(3) : 170 -174.
10Kennady MC, Tucker MR, Lester GE, et al. Stress shielding effect of rigid internal Fixation plates on mandibular bone grafts. A photon absorption densitometry and quantitative computerized tomographic evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1989, 18(5) : 307 -310.
6Srmiento A.450 closed fractures of the distl third of the tibitreatedwith a functional brace [J]. Olin Orthop Felat laes, 2004,428: 267-271.
7Augat P,Merk J,lna, tius A,et al.The role of cortical bone and ia microstructure in bone srengtb[J] .Age Ageing,2006,35(Supp12):ii27-ii31.
8Karlst ron G, Olerud S.lpsilat eral fracture of the femur and tibia [J].J Bone Joint Surg (Am),7977,59(2).240-243.
9Beery--Lipperm&n M, Gefen A. A method of qu&ntification of stress shielding in the proximal femur using hierarchical eomputationalmodeling[J]. OomputMethods Biomech Biomed Engin, 2006,9(1): 55-44.
10Champy M, Lodd' e J, Sehmitt R, et al. Mandibular osteosynthesis by miniature screwed plates via a buccal%pproach [J]. J Maxillofae Surg, 1978, 6(1): 14-21.
