摘要
目的分析阿米替林治疗无效的抑郁症患者的相关因素。方法在一定血药浓度标准下对59例抑郁症患者采用阿米替林治疗8周,其间测查明尼苏达人格测查(MMPI)、听觉诱发电位(P300)、24小时尿3甲氧基4羟基苯乙二醇(MHPG)、血T3、T4等指标,以汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)和副反应量表(TESS)评价疗效及副作用,将治疗前后HAMD量表减分率<50%者确定为“无效”。采用Logistic回归方法分析形成治疗无效的相关因素,无效组与有效组之间以t检验及χ2检验进行比较。结果显示情感病家族史、本次起病形式、躯体疾病和非精神科药物使用、MMPI中D因子分、偏执症状、副作用等6项指标与治疗无效的形成相关。而其它一些因素,如自杀、激越、P300波幅等在两组间差异也有显著性。结论提示有情感病家族史、缓慢起病、伴有偏执症状的抑郁症患者对阿米替林的疗效不佳,这类患者的人格特征较为抑郁,治疗中的副作用较大。
Objective The purpose of the study was to determine the correlations of amitriptylineresistant depression. Methods Fifty-nine patients with depression were treated with amitriptyline, and their plasma drug concentration reached a certain level for at least eight weeks in this study. MMPI, Auditory Brain Evoked Potentials (P300 ), MHPG, triiodothyronine (T3), thyroxin (T4) and Life Events Scale (LES) were examined during the study. Outcome and side effects were assessed by Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS) respectively. The amitriptylineresistant depression was defined as the change of HAMD lower than 50%. Logistic regression analysis, ttest and chisquare test were used to analyze the correlations. Results Poor response to a therapeutic amitriptyline trial was significantly associated with family history of affective disorder, present form of episode, physical diseases, D factor in MMPI, paranoid idea in HAMD and side effects. Conclusion The study suggests that the patients with affective disorders, family history, associated with paranoid symptom, with depressive personality, with severe side effect of antidepressant, complicated with physical diseases tend to be amitriptylineresistant depression.
出处
《中华精神科杂志》
CAS
CSCD
1998年第3期148-151,共4页
Chinese Journal of Psychiatry
关键词
阿米替林
抑郁症
医疗无效
因素分析
Amitriptyline Depression Medical futility Factor analysis, statistical