期刊文献+

四川省潜在蒸散量估算模型 被引量:11

Estimation Models of Potential Evapotranspiration in Sichuan Province
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Penman-Monteith法是FAO-56推荐的计算潜在蒸散量的标准方法,但由于涉及的气象要素较多,难于在业务中应用。以综合气象干旱指数的业务化应用为目标,利用1971—2000年四川省156个气象站的观测资料,以Pen-man-Monteith法计算结果作为标准,分析了Thornthwaite法和Hargreaves法对川西高原和四川盆地年、月潜在蒸散量的估算精度,建立了可供业务应用的ET0估算模型,并应用于2006年四川省特大伏旱监测,结果表明:Thorn-thwaite法反映不出ET0的年际变化,在冬季显著偏小,而Hargreaves法对ET0的年际变化具有较好的反映能力,与Thornthwaite法相比,其ET0年、月估算值更接近于Penman-Monteith法标准值,且Hargreaves法估算值与Pen-man-Monteith法标准值之间具有较好的线性关系,引入风速和相对湿度两个订正因子后,Hargreaves订正值的误差可控制在10%以内,基于该文ET0估算模型计算的综合气象干旱指数对四川干旱具有较强的监测能力。 Penman-Monteith formula is a standard method recommended by FAO-56 to calculate potential evapotranspiration.But it is difficult to apply in practical operation as not all related meteorological elements can be obtained in reality,so estimation models are used instead.In order to apply compound drought index in operation,Thornthwaite method and Hargreaves method for yearly and monthly potential evapotranspiration of Sichuan Basin and West Sichuan Plateau are studied.The observation data of 156 meteorological stations in Sichuan Province from 1971 to 2000 are investigated including minimum temperature,maximum temperature,wind speed,relative humidity,and sunshine hours.Using result of Penman-Monteith formula as the ET0 standard value,the precisions of the two ET0 estimation methods are analyzed.Comparing wind speed,relative humidity,Hargreaves method and Penman-Monteith method statistically,an operational Hargreaves method is established.These Hargreaves method and model have been applied to monitor serious summer drought in 2006 in Sichuan Province.The results show: As far as annual variation is concerned,annual value fluctuation estimated by Thornthwaite method is small so that it cannot reflect the ET0 annual variation.However,Hargreaves method and PM method show basically consistent changing tendency and can reflect the ET0 annual variation characteristics better.As for the annual mean,result of Thornthwaite method is significantly smaller.The error in the Basin is-10%—-20% and-40%—-60% on Plateau.Result of Hargreaves method is relatively smaller in Plateau and larger in Basin.But its error is 10%—15%,better than Thornthwaite's.As for the seasonal variation,error of Thornthwaite method is larger in winter but smaller in summer.Due to the influence of relative humidity and wind speed,seasonality of Hargreaves method's error is not obvious.The error of Hargreaves is smaller than that of Thornthwaite especially in Plateau region except for in summer.Results of Penman-Monteith formula and Hargreaves method show good linear relation.With the recovery factors air velocity and relative humidity introduced,the error of Hargreaves correction value can be controlled within 10%.It can meet the demand of practical operation for precision.The compound drought index calculated by this ET0 estimation model has strong capability for drought monitoring in Sichuan Province.
出处 《应用气象学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第6期729-736,共8页 Journal of Applied Meteorological Science
基金 四川省应用技术研究与开发项目(2007NGY005) 中国气象局项目"三峡库区气候监测 预警 评估业务运行和改进"共同资助
关键词 四川 潜在蒸散量 精度比较 估算模型 Sichuan potential evapotranspiration accuracy comparison estimation model
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献152

共引文献863

同被引文献157

引证文献11

二级引证文献126

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部