期刊文献+

脊柱形态测量仪(Spinalmouse)测评腰痛患者全脊柱运动能力 被引量:21

Spinal mobility of low back pain patients measured by the Spinalmouse
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的量化测量脊柱各个椎体椎间角度变化,评估腰痛患者全脊柱运动能力。方法使用脊柱动态测量仪(Spimalmouse)测量34例腰痛患者不同姿势下的脊柱形态,得出量化脊柱各个椎体之间椎间角角度,并摄腰段X线片并测量,所得数据间进行独立样本t检验和配对样本t检验。结果直立位胸腰椎各个节段之间椎间角度基本符合脊柱生理曲线,前屈时T1-7,没有椎间角度变化差异,T8以下差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。后伸时T6-8,T12、L1,L2,3这4个节段椎间角变化差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。在与X线片对比时,T11~L3的各个椎间角度的结果是与影像学资料测量的角度数据基本一致的,差异无统计学意义,但在L3~S1,测量结果差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05).结论Spinalmouse可以直接、方便地测量出胸、腰椎各个椎间角变化,并且存在很好的可靠性、重复性和可信性,是脊柱各个节段运动能力评定的良好工具,且避免了X线辐射。 Objective To measure spinal intervertebral angles in order to value the spinal mobility function of the low back pain patients. Methods All the 34 low back pain patients were measured by Spinalmouse and X-rays in different positions. Each spinal intervertebral angle was calculated in different groups by t test ( independent or paired). Results The spinal intervertebral angles were fit to the normal spinal physiological curve. When flexion, the spinal curve at T1-7 level changed little, while Ts - S1 changed significianly ( P 〈 0.05 ) While extension, the most changes happened at T6-8, T22 - 1, L2.3 segments (P 〈0.05). To compare with X-rays, T11 -L3 were no significant different changes while L3 -S1 had significant difference (P 〈0.05). Conclusion Spinalmouse can measure spinal intervertebral angles directly and conveniently. It is a good i snstrument to value the spinal mobility function with good reliability, repetitiveness and creditability and without any X-ray radiation.
出处 《脊柱外科杂志》 2009年第6期346-349,360,共5页 Journal of Spinal Surgery
关键词 腰椎 腰痛 活动范围 关节 设备和供应 Lumbar vertebrae Low back pain Range of motion, articular Equipment and Supplies
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献54

  • 1秦民益,傅长根,胡毓亮,邱君斓,胡安宁.数字化立位全脊柱成像技术的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2004,38(6):656-658. 被引量:16
  • 2邱贵兴,李其一,王以朋,仉建国,沈健雄,翁习生,王亭.特发性重度僵硬性脊柱侧凸的手术治疗[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(12):807-810. 被引量:27
  • 3史建静,许崇永,赵晓君.全下肢及全脊柱成像技术的临床应用[J].放射学实践,2005,20(9):833-834. 被引量:13
  • 4Cheh G,Lenke LG,Lehman RA Jr,et al.The reliability of preoperative supine radiographs to predict the amount of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis[J].Spine,2007,32(24):2668-2672.
  • 5King HA,Moe JH,Bradford DS,et al.The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1983,65(9):1302-1313.
  • 6Vedantam R,Lenke LG,Bridwell KH,et al.Comparison of push-prone and lateral-bending radiographs for predicting postoperative coronal alignment in thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliotic curves[J].Spine,2000,25(1):76-81.
  • 7Tokunaga M,Minami S,Kitahara H,et al.Vertebral decancellation for severe scoliosis[J].Spine,2000,25(4):469-474.
  • 8Luk KD,Lu DS,Cheung KM,et al.A prospective comparison of the coronal deformity correction in thoracic scoliosis using four different instrumentations and the fulcrum-bending radiograph[J].Spine,2004,29(5):560-563.
  • 9[1]Kaptanoglu E, Tuncel M, Palaoglu S, et al. Comparison of the effects of melatonin and methylprednisolone in experimental spinal cord injury[J]. J Neurosurg, 2000, 93 (Suppl 1): S77-S84
  • 10[2]Falconer JC, Narayana PA, Bhattacharjee M, et al. Characterization of an experimental spinal cord injury model using waveform and morphometric analysis[J]. Spine, 1996, 21: 104-112

共引文献113

同被引文献141

引证文献21

二级引证文献130

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部