期刊文献+

人工智能难题和程序语义学 被引量:1

Artificial Intelligence Puzzle and Procedural Semantics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 句法机如何成为语义机是人工智能面临的难题,也是当代意向性理论研究的重点。程序语义学是试图解释这一问题的重要致思取向。它认为传统的人工智能、计算机科学等是以模态理论语义分析为基础的,其研究尚停留在符号的层面,而未涉及到真值、指称,即没有涉及到语言与世界的关联。在揭示语言与世界关联如何实现的问题上,程序语义学强调语义不是由对指称的计算所给予的,也不是由谓词逻辑的标准语义学所给予的,而是由程序给予的。程序语义学不但能够融合如福吉勒特等意义理论的局限,而且所提出的过程性分析和知识对于人工智能的研究、发展亦有启示性。 How syntactic machine to be semantic machine is the problem that artificial intelligence is faced with and the focus of eontemporary consciousness theory. Procedural semantics is important direction to explain the problem. It considers that the traditional artificial intelligence, computer sci- ence, etc. are based on modal theory semantic analysis and remain at the symbol level, not related to true value and reference, that is, not related to the language associated with the world. On revealing how language to be associated with world, procedural semantics emphasizes that semantics is not given by calculation of reference or by standard semantics of predicate logic, but by the procedures. Procedural semantics not only accommodate the theory of meaning, such as Fodor, and Garrett, but also provide an instructive way of development of artificial intelligence with a purely procedural knowledge.
出处 《重庆理工大学学报(社会科学)》 CAS 2010年第1期29-33,56,共6页 Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Social Science)
关键词 人工智能 程序语义学 内部语言假说 程序内涵理论 artificial intelligence procedural semantics interior language hypothesis procedural connotation theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Johnson-Laird P N.How in meaning mentally Repre-sented[].Meaning and Mental Representation.1988
  • 2Suppes P.procedural semantics[].LanguageLogicand Philosophyproceedings of theth International Wittgenstein Symposium.1980
  • 3Woods W.Problems in Procedural Semantics[].Meaning and Cognitive Structure.1986
  • 4Wilks Y.Reference and Its Role In Computational Mod-els of Mental Representation[].Meaning and MentalRepresentations.1988
  • 5Schank R,,Kass A.Knowledge Representation in Peo-ple and Machines[].Meaning and Mental Represen-tations.1988
  • 6Hangeland J.How Can a Symbol"Mean"Something?[].Meaning and Cognitive Structure.1986
  • 7Johnson-Laird.Mental Models of Meaning[].Elements of Discourse Understanding.1981

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部