枉法仲裁行为刑事规制的正当性

Legitimacy of Law-bending Arbitration Regulation

《刑法修正案(六)》第20条确立了枉法仲裁罪,从该修正案的草案阶段开始至今,围绕该罪是否应该设立,社会各界一直争论不休。现在,枉法仲裁罪的确立虽已尘埃落定,但各种批评意见却愈发热烈,且直指该罪存废问题。纵观仲裁员刑事责任制度的价值诉求、理论基础、法律基础、现实条件及经济学依据五个方面,枉法仲裁行为刑事规制的正当性自然凸现。

In the 20th section of ＂Criminal Law Amendment （6）＂, there is a new law-bending arbitration crime. The dispute on the setting up is continued from beginning of the draft of the amendment. Now, although the result is settled, a variety of criticisms have become more and more feverish, and directed at the abolition of the crime. In this article, the author intends to analyze the legitimacy of the incrimination of law-bending arbitration from five perspectives like the value of demands, theoretical basis, legal basis, current conditions and methodology to demonstrate the legitimacy of criminal regulation.