期刊文献+

不同生活型绿化植物叶片碳同位素组成的季节特征 被引量:16

Seasonal differences in leaf carbon isotope composition among landscaping species of different life forms in Beijing,China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过测定北京地区不同生活型绿化植物叶片的碳同位素组成(δ13C值),从植物种和生活型两个方面研究植物水分利用效率的自然可变性。结果表明:所测定的75种植物(隶属于35科65属)的叶片的δ13C值变幅,春季为-30.7‰--23.4‰,夏季为-31.5‰--25.1‰,秋季为-31.4‰--23.9‰;落叶灌木种间差异不显著(p=0.114),而常绿乔木(p=0.005)、落叶乔木(p<0.001)、常绿灌木(p=0.022)、草本植物(p<0.001)和藤本植物(p=0.001)的种间差异显著或极显著;同一生活型植物叶片的δ13C季节差异显著,春季叶片的δ13C值显著大于夏秋两季(常绿乔木除外),不同生活型植物叶片的δ13C值在春、夏、秋3个季节差异都达到了极显著水平(春季p=0.001、夏季p<0.001、秋季p<0.001),且叶片的δ13C值表现出乔木树种>灌木树种>藤本植物>草本植物、常绿植物>落叶植物的规律。因此,植物种和生活型均会引起植物叶片δ13C值的变化,但δ13C受生活型变化的影响较大,表明不同生活型植物的水分利用效率具有明显差异。 Aims Plants with high water use efficiency could contribute to an overall lower water-using landscape. Our objective was to analyze differences in water use efficiency among landscaping plants in Beijing, China. Methods We used stable carbon isotope techniques to investigate δ^13C values of 75 species belonging to 35 families and 65 genera in spring, summer and autumn in 2006 and analyzed variations in water use efficiency of different plant species and different life forms (evergreen tree, deciduous tree, evergreen shrub, deciduous shrub, forb and liana).Important findings Leaf δ^13C values varied between -30.7‰ and -23.4‰ in spring, -31.5‰ and -25.1‰ in summer and -31.4‰ and -23.9‰ in autumn. Differences of δ^13C values were not significant in deciduous shrub species (p = 0.114), but were significant in evergreen trees (p = 0.005), deciduous trees (p 〈 0.001), evergreen shrubs (p = 0.022), forbs (p 〈 0.001) and lianas (p = 0.001). Leaf δ^13C values were significantly different among seasons, being greater in spring than in summer and autumn (except for evergreen trees). The δ^13C values for life forms were significantly different in different seasons, with a sequence of trees〉shrubs〉lianas〉forbs, and evergreen plants〉deciduous plants. Results showed that variation of leaf δ^13C is dependent on species and life form, especially life form, and that water use efficiency differed greatly among life forms.
出处 《植物生态学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第2期151-159,共9页 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
基金 国家自然科学基金(30671675) 北京市科技计划资助项目(D0605001040191) 沈阳农业大学青年教师科研基金(20081014)
关键词 碳同位素组成 绿化植物 生活型 季节特征 水分利用高效率 carbon isotope composition, landscape plants, life form, seasonal characteristic, water use efficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献25

  • 1Sobrado M A. Cost-benefit relationships in deciduous and evergreen leaves of tropical dry forest species [J], Funct Ecol, 1991,5: 608- 616.
  • 2Quigley M E, Platt W J. Composition and structure of seasonally forests in the Americas [J]. Ecol Monogr, 2003, 73(1): 87-106.
  • 3Kikuzawa K. A cost-benefit analysis of leaf habit and leaf longevity of trees and their geographical pattern [J]. Amer Natrual, 1991, 138: 1250-1263.
  • 4Kikuzawa K, Ackerly D. Significancc of leaf longevity in plants [J]. Plant Spec Biol, 1999, 14: 39-45.
  • 5Monk C D. An ecological significance evegrecnness [J]. Ecology, 1966, 47: 504-505.
  • 6Mooney H A. The carbon balance of plants [J]. Ann Rev Ecol System, 1972, 2: 315-346.
  • 7Chapin F S. The mineral nutrition of wild plains [J]. Ann Rev Ecol System, 1980, 11 : 233-260.
  • 8Aerts R. The advantages of being evergreen [J]. Trends Ecol Evol, 1995, 10: 402-407.
  • 9Salleo S, Nardini A, Logullo A M. Is sclerophylly of Mediterranean evergreens and adaptation to drought? [J] New Phytol, 1997, 135: 603-612.
  • 10Givnish T J. Adapative significance of evergreen vs. deciduous leaves: solving the triple paradox [J]. Silva Fenn, 2002, 36(3) :703- 743.

共引文献46

同被引文献251

引证文献16

二级引证文献146

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部