期刊文献+

基于频域的结构相似度的视频质量评价

Video quality assessment based on frequency domain of structural similarity
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于结构相似度的视频质量评价方法(VSSIM)结构简单,性能优于峰值信噪比(PSNR),但是在研究中发现VSSIM不能很好地评价严重模糊的低码率视频。该文提出一种基于频域的结构相似度的视频质量评价方法。该方法将频域信息作为主要的结构信息,根据人眼对不同频率分量的敏感程度不同,对离散余弦变换后的各频率分量加权得到频域函数。由频域函数、亮度函数和对比度函数经过视频内容的加权计算得到结构相似度。实验结果表明:该方法比VSSIM和PSNR更符合人眼视觉系统特性,能较好的评价视频质量。 Although the structural similarity based video quality assessment VSSIM (Video Structural SIMilarity) is simple and has been proven to be better than the PSNR (peak signal to noise ratio), there are still some difficulties in assessing badly blurred low bit rate video. This paper presents a frequency domain based structural similarity standard for video quality assessment. The method uses frequency domain information as the main structural information and calculates a frequency domain function for the frame from weighted frequency components after a discrete cosine transform based on the human eyes with different sensitivities in the frequency domain. The structural similarity is calculated using the frequency domain, the brightness, and the contrast functions with video content based weights. Tests show that this model is more consistent with the human visual system and can assess the video quality more precisely than the VSSIM or PSNR.
出处 《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第1期121-124,共4页 Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(60572081)
关键词 视频质量评价 结构相似度 频域 人眼视觉系统 video quality assessment structural similarity frequency domain human visual system (HVS)
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Mannos J L, Sakrison D J. The effects of a visual fidelity criterion on the encoding of images [J]. IEEE Trans on Information Theory, 1974, 20(4) : 525 - 536.
  • 2Ong E P, Lin W S, Lu Z K, et al. Perceptual quality metric for H. 264 low bit rate video [C]//IEEE Int Conf on Multimedia and Expo (ICME 2006). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: IEEE, 2006 : 677 - 680.
  • 3Hasan M A, Kim W, Kim C, et al. Color error measure for IPTV service quality evaluation [C]//10th Int Conf on Adv Commu Tech (ICACT 2008). Gangwon-Do, Republic of Korea: IEEE, 2008, 2:1407- 1412.
  • 4Seshadrinathan K, Bovik A C. Multi-scale and scalable video quality assessment [C]//Int Conf on Consumer Electronics (ICCE 2008). Las Vegas, USA: IEEE, 2008:1-2.
  • 5QIANG Li, ZHOU Wang. Video quality assessment by incorporating a motion perception model [C]//Int Conf on Image Processing (ICIP 2007). San Antonio, TX, USA: IEEE, 2007, 2: 173-176.
  • 6VQEG. Final report from the video quality experts group on the validation of objective models of video quality assessment [DB/OL]. (2000-03). http: //www. vqeg. org/.
  • 7Wang Z, Bovik A C, Sheikh H R, et al. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity [J]. IEEE Trans on Image Processing, 2004, 13(4): 600- 612.
  • 8WANG Zhou, LU Ligang, Bovik A C. Video quafity assessment using structural distortion measurement [C]//Int Conf on Image Processing (ICIP 2002). New York, USA: IEEE, 2002, 3: 65-68.
  • 9李航,路羊,崔慧娟,唐昆.基于频域的结构相似度的图像质量评价方法[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2009(4):559-562. 被引量:36
  • 10ISO CD10918-1. Digital compression and coding of continuous tone still pictures [S]. CCITT, 1991.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Mannos J L, Sakrison D J. The effects of a visual fidelity criterion on the encoding of images [J].IEEE Trans on Information Theory, 1974, 20(4): 525- 536.
  • 2Daly S. The Visible Difference Predictor: An Algorithm for the Assessment of Image Fidelity, Digital Images and Human Vision [M]. Massachusetts, USA: The MIT Press, 1993:179 - 206.
  • 3Sheikh H R, Bovik A C. Image information and visual quality [J]. IEEE Trans Image Processing, 2006, 15(2): 430- 444.
  • 4Ninassi A, Le Meur O, Le Callet P, et al. Does where you gaze on an image affect your perception of quality? Applying visual attention to image quality metric [C]// IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP 2007). San Antonio, TX, USA, 2007: 11 169- 172.
  • 5Susu Y, Lin W, Lu Z K, et al. Image quality measure using curvature similarity [C]// IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP 2007). San Antonio, TX, USA, 2007: III 437-440.
  • 6VQEG. Final report from the video quality experts group on the validation of objective models of video quality assessment [EB/OL]. (2000-03). http://www. vqeg. org/.
  • 7Zhou W, Bovik A C, Ligang L. Why is image qua'lity assessment so difficult? [C]// Proc of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'02), 2002. Orlando, FL, USA, 2002: IV 3313 - 3316.
  • 8Wang Z, Bovik A C, Sheikh H R, et al. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity [J].IEEE Trans on linage Processing, 2004, 13(4) : 600 - 612.
  • 9JPEG (ISO/IEC .[TCI/SC2/WG8). Digital Compression and Coding of Continuous Tone Still Pictures [S]. ISO CD10918-1, 1991.
  • 10Sheikh H R, Wang Z, Cormack L, et al. LIVE image quality assessment database release 2 [DB/OL]. (2005). http ://live. ece. utexas, edu/research/quality.

共引文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部