期刊文献+

尿α_1-微球蛋白在新生儿窒息后肾损伤中的意义 被引量:7

The significance of urine α_1-microglobulin in renal injury when after neonatal asphyxia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨尿α1-微球蛋白在新生儿窒息后肾功能损伤的意义。方法窒息新生儿58例按出生时Apgar评分分为轻度窒息组32例、重度窒息组26例;同期选择30例健康足月新生儿作为健康对照组。所有患儿在生后3d内采用酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)检测尿α1-微球蛋白(α1-MG)浓度,并与其血清尿素氮(BUN)、肌酐(Cr)水平进行对比。结果重度窒息组和轻度窒息组的BUN、Cr和尿α1-MG水平高于健康对照组,且重度窒息组BUN、Cr和尿α1-MG水平显著高于轻度窒息组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。轻度窒息组和重度窒息组尿α1-MG异常检出率均显著高于同组血清BUN和Cr异常检出率,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01)。结论尿α1-MG是评价新生儿窒息后肾功能损害的敏感指标。 Objective To discuss the clinical significance of α1-microglobnlin in Urine for estimating renal dysfunction induced by neonatal asphyxia. Methods 58 cases of neonatal asphyxia were divided into mild asphyxia group( 32 cases) , severe asphyxia group(26 cases)according to Apgar score. 30 cases of healthy full-term newborns were choiced as a control group in the same period. The level of α1 -MG in urine detected by immunoturbidimetric assay was compared with serum urea (BUN) and creatinine(Cr) on the third day after birth. Results BUN,Cr and urine α1-MG in severe asphyxia group and the mild asphyxia group were higher than that in healthy control group, as while as the severe asphyxia group of BUN, Cr and urine α1-MG level was significantly higher than the mild asphyxia group, the difference were statistically significant (P 〈 0. 01 ). Mild asphyxia group and the severe asphyxia group of urine α1 -MG abnormal detection rate were significantly higher than those with abnormal serum BUN and Cr detection rates, the differences were statistically significant(P 〈 0. 05 or P 〈 0. 01 ). Conclusion Urinary α1 -MG was an sensitive indicator to evaluate renal dysfunction after neonatal asphyxia.
出处 《临床合理用药杂志》 2010年第4期50-51,共2页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use
关键词 新生儿 窒息 Α1-微球蛋白 肾损害 Newborn, asphyxia Alpha( 1 ) -microglobulin Urine Renal dysfunction
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献17

  • 1樊绍曾.新生儿窒息诊断处理及器官损害[J].小儿急救医学,1995,2(1):1-2. 被引量:25
  • 2伍志钢.肾功能检查[A].见:易著文主编.小儿临床肾脏病学[C].北京:人民卫生出版社,1997.90.
  • 3Dalton RN, Haycock GB. Laboratory investigation. In:Barrett TM,Avner ED, Harmon WE, eds. Pediatric Nephrology. 4th ed. Lippincott: Williams & Wilkins, 1999. 343.
  • 4Rocco MV, Buckalew VM, Moore Le, et al. Measurement of glomerular filtration rate using non-radioactive iohexol: comparison of two one-compartment models. Am J Nephrol, 1996,16:138.
  • 5Sugita O, Uchiyama K, Yamada T, et al. Reference values of serum and urine creatinine,and of creatinine clearance by a new enzymatic method. Ann Clin Biochem, 1992,29 : 523.
  • 6Schwartz G J, Gauthier B. A simple estimate of glomerular filtration rate in adolescent boys. J Pediatr, 1985,106:522.
  • 7Mitch WE, Walser M, Burlington GA, et al. A simple method of estimating progression of chronic renal failure. Lancet, 1976, 18:1326.
  • 8方炜.肾小球滤过率的检测及进展[J].国外医学(泌尿系统分册),1997,17(4):178-180. 被引量:25
  • 9T. B?melburg,G. Jorch.Investigations of renal artery blood flow velocity in preterm and term neonates by pulsed Doppler ultrasonography[J]. European Journal of Pediatrics . 1988 (3)
  • 10Seikaly MG,,Arant Bs Jr.Development of renal hemodynamics:glomerular filtration and renal blood flow. Clin,Perinatol . 1992

共引文献20

同被引文献55

引证文献7

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部