期刊文献+

真空与堆载预压法地基处理的对比分析 被引量:4

SOME COMPARISIONS BETWEEN VACCUM PRELOADING METHOD AND SURCHARGE PRELOADING METHOD
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以现场实测数据为依据,对真空预压法和堆载预压法两种地基处理方式进行比较。简述了两种地基处理法的发展史及作用机理;通过现场实测沉降曲线对比了两种预压法下土体沉降速率;通过静力触探比贯入阻力曲线对两种方法的加固效果进行比较;通过Asaoka拟合法及理论计算对两种方法的沉降进行预测及对比。 This paper makes a comparison of vacuum preloading method and surcharge preloading method based on the on-site measured data. The development histories and the preloading mechanism of the two methods are introduced. The field measured s-t curves are introduced to compare the settlement rate of the two methods. The CPT penetration resistance curves are also used to compare the reinforeemem effects of the two methods. The ultimate settlements of the foundation are predicted through asaoka fitting method and calculation.
出处 《低温建筑技术》 2010年第2期95-98,共4页 Low Temperature Architecture Technology
关键词 真空预压法 堆载预压法 ASAOKA法 对比分析 vacuum preloading method surcharge preloading method Asaoka fitting method comparison and analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1S - W Yah J Chu. Soil improvement for a storage yard using the combined vacuum and flU preloading method[ J]. Can Geotech, 2005,42 : 1094- 1104.
  • 2Asaoka A. Observational procedure of settlement prediction[ J]. Soils and Foundations, 1978,18(4) : 87 - 101.
  • 3J C Chai, J P Carter, S Hayashi. Ground deformation induced by vacum consolidation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2005,131 (12) : 1552 - 1561.
  • 4沈珠江 等.软土地基真空排水预压的固结变形分析.岩土工程学报,1986,(3):7-15.
  • 5张泽鹏,李约俊,冯淦清,洪宝宁.塑料排水板在真空预压加固软基中的作用[J].广州大学学报(自然科学版),2002,1(2):68-71. 被引量:30
  • 6高志义 张美燕.真空预压加固的离心模型试验研究.港口工程,1988,(1):18-24.

二级参考文献4

共引文献81

同被引文献185

引证文献4

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部