期刊文献+

细菌感染患者外周血中性粒细胞表面CD64指数的变化 被引量:30

Change of neutrophil CD64 index in the peripheral blood of patients with bacterial infection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察不同感染程度患者外周血中性粒细胞表面CD64的表达水平,评价CD64对诊断细菌感染的实用价值。方法将110名研究对象分为4组,即败血症组、局部感染组、病毒感染组和正常对照组。采用流式细胞仪、免疫浊度法和血液分析仪分别检测各组研究对象外周血CD64指数的表达水平、C反应蛋白(CRP)含量、白细胞(WBC)数量及中性粒细胞的百分比(Neu%)。结果败血症组CD64指数(5.12±2.10)明显高于其他3组(P<0.001),局部感染组(2.51±1.64)与病毒感染组(1.35±0.39)、正常对照组(1.00±0.31)比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001),病毒感染组与正常对照组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。细菌感染组(败血症组+局部感染组)CD64与CRP、WBC、Neu%呈正相关(r=0.81、0.46、0.43,P均<0.05)。根据受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,当CD64指数临界值取1.34时,敏感性为89.7%,特异性为79.8%。结论中性粒细胞表面CD64指数可以作为诊断细菌感染的敏感指标,特别是对败血症的诊断更有价值。 Objective To observe the level of neutrophil surface CD64 in the peripheral blood of patients with different degrees of bacterial infection, and evaluate the practical value of CD64 in diagnosis of bacterial infection. Methods 110 subjects were classified into four groups: sepsis, local bacterial infection, viral infection and normal control. For all subjects, the levels of the index of CD64, C reaction protein (CRP) , white blood cell (WBC) and the percent of neutrophil ( Neu% ) in the peripheral blood were measured by automatic flow cytometry, immunoturbidimetry and haematology analyser. Results The index of CD64 in the sepsis group (5.12 ± 2.10) was significantly higher than that in the other three groups( P 〈 0. 001 ), and the index of CD64 in the local bacterial infection group (2.51 ± 1.64) was higher than that in the viral infection group ( 1. 35 ± 0. 39) and the normal control group (1.00 ± 0. 31 , P 〈 0. 001 ). There was no statistical difference in the viral infection group and the normal control group (P 〉 0.05 ). The index of CD64 in bacterial infection group (including sepsis group and local bacterial infection ) had positive correlation with CRP, WBC and Neu% ( r = 0. 81, 0.46, 0.43, P 〈 0.05 ). According to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the best threshold in diagnosis of infection was 1.34 with the sensitivity of 89.7% and the specificity of 79.8%. Conclusions Neutrophil surface CD64 index may be a sensitive index for diagnosing bacterial infection, especially sepsis.
出处 《检验医学》 CAS 北大核心 2010年第2期96-99,共4页 Laboratory Medicine
关键词 CD64指数 细菌感染 C反应蛋白 CD64 index Bacterial infection C reactive protein
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Davis BH. Improved diagnostic approaches to infection/ sepsis detection [ J]. Expert Rev Mol Diagn, 2005,5 (2) :193-207.
  • 2Ng PC, Li G, Chui KM, et al. Neutrophil CD64 is a sensitive diagnostic marker for early-onset neonatal infection[ J]. Pediatr Res,2004,56(5 ) :796-803.
  • 3Zhang G, Qiao S, Li Q, et al. Molecular cloning and expression of the porcine high-affinity immunoglobulin G Fc receptor (FcgammaRI)[J]. Immunogenetics, 2006, 58(10) :845-849.
  • 4Danikas DD, Karakantza M, Theodorou GL,et al. Prognostic value of phagocytic activity of neutrophils and monocytes in sepsis. Correlation to CD64 and CD14 antigen expression[J]. Clin Exp Immunol, 2008, 154 ( 1 ) : 87-97.
  • 5Allen E, Bakke AC,Purtzer MZ, et al. Neutrophil CD64 expression : distinguishing acute inflammatory autoimmune disease from systemic infections[J]. Ann Rheum Dis,2002,61 (6) : 522-525.
  • 6Davis BH,Olsen SH, Ahmad E, et al. Neutrophil CD64 is an improved indicator of infection or sepsis in emergency department patients [J].Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2006, 130 (5) :654-661.
  • 7Nuutila J, Hohenthal U, Laitinen I, et al. Simultaneous quantitative analysis of FcgammaRI (CD64) expression on neutrophils and monocytes: a new, improved way to detect infections [ J]. J Immunol Methods, 2007, 328 (1-2) : 189-200.
  • 8Zarev PV, Davis BH. Comparative study of monocyte enumeration by flow cytometry: improved detection by combining monocyte-related antibodies with anti-CD163 [J].Lab Hematol, 2004, 10(1) :24-31.

同被引文献233

引证文献30

二级引证文献200

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部