期刊文献+

北京市五家大型综合医院“重返类”指标的比较分析 被引量:66

A Comparative Analysis of "Re-entry Category" Indicators in Five Major General Hospitals in Beijing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用"中国医疗质量指标体系(CHQIS)"中部分"重返类"指标,即非计划再入院类指标和重返手术室类指标,比较分析了北京市5家大型综合医院的医疗质量。结果表明,"重返类"指标较传统指标能够更为敏感。借助"重返类"指标分析结果和病案首页的信息进行"根因分析",可以比较精确地发现医疗质量问题。本研究采用的多家医院横向比较分析方法,有助于医院通过质量"标杆"发现自身存在的问题。 Abstract The study used "re -entry category" indicators, which is part of "China~ health care quality indicators (CQIS)" that is, unplanned re - admission category of indicators and to return to the operating room categories of indicators, to comparative analyze the medical quality in Beijing~ five major general hospitals. The results indicate that the "re - entry category" indicators can reflect the quality of care more sensitive than traditional indicators. With "re - entry category" targets analysis and medical record information in the "root cause analysis", the problems in medical care can be analyzed in detail. This study used a horizontal com- parative analysis of several hospitals to help the hospitals discover their own problems through the quality "benchmark".
出处 《中国卫生质量管理》 2010年第1期4-7,共4页 Chinese Health Quality Management
关键词 医疗质量 比较 非计划再入院率 重返手术室发生率 Medical Quality Comparison Unplanned Rcadmission Rate the Incidence of Return to the Operating Room
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献10

  • 1Brennan T A, Leape L L, Laird N M, et al. Incident of adverse events and negligence in-hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard medical Practice Study I[J]. N Engl J Med, 1991, 324: 370- 376.
  • 2Leape L L, Brennan T A, Laird N M, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard medical Practice Study I[J]. N Engl J Med, 1991, 324: 377-384.
  • 3Wilson R M, Runciman W B, Gibberd R W, et al. The Quality in Australian Health Care Study [J]. Medical Journal of Australia, 1995, 163(1): 458-471.
  • 4Cantrill J A, Sibbald B, Buetow S. Indicators of the appropriateness of long term prescribing in general praetiee in the United Kingdom: Consensus development, face and eontent validity, feasibility and reliability[J]. Quality in Health Care, 1998(7): 130-135.
  • 5Kazandjian V A, Matthes N, Wicker K G.Are performance indicators generic? The international experience of the Quality Indicator Project [J]. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2003 (5): 265-276.
  • 6Richard Thomson, Sally Taber, Joanne Lally, et al. UK Quality In: dicator Project (UK QIP) and the UK independent healthcare sector: a new development [J ]. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2004, 16: 51-56.
  • 7Ansari MZ, Ackland MJ. Jolley DJ, et al. Inter-hospital comparison of mortality rates[J].Int J Qual Health Care. 1999( 11 ): 29-35.
  • 8Lagasse, RS, Steinberg ES, Katz RJ, et al. Defining quality of perioperative care by statistical process control of adverse outecomes[J]. Anesthesiology, 1995(82): 1181-1188.
  • 9马谢民.国际医疗质量指标体系及其特点[J].中国医院管理,2007,27(11):22-24. 被引量:62
  • 10马谢民.我国评价医疗质量指标中存在的主要问题剖析[J].中国医院管理,2007,27(12):43-44. 被引量:18

共引文献102

同被引文献462

引证文献66

二级引证文献376

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部