摘要
有不少人将雷默提出的以"创新"和"公平"为核心理念的与"华盛顿共识"非常不同的"北京共识"理解为是对改革开放以来中国发展经验的历史总结,这种理解是不符合事实的。尽管与其他国家同时期展开的市场转型过程相比,中国改革开放以来的市场转型在发展策略上有自己的特点,但在基本方向上与20世纪80年代以来世界各主要国家普遍展开的市场化改革进程基本一致。而雷默以"北京共识"为题所概括的三大定理,只能被理解为近年来中国政府在总结以往发展经验与教训的基础上为中国未来的发展道路所确立的一种新战略模式。但即便如此,雷默的某些论述也有过于简单之嫌,需要重新加以阐释。
Quite some scholars believe that the Beijing Consensus,which is put forward by J.C.Ramo,oriented to 'innovation' and 'fairness',is the summary of historical experience of China's development since the reform and opening-up.This is clearly inconsistent with the facts.Although compared with the market transformation conducted at the same time in other nations,the Chinese market transformation since the Reform and Opening-Up had its own features,it is generally similar to the market reform in other key nations since the 80s of 20th century.The three proving methods Ramo concluded concerning Beijing Consensus can only be interpreted as a summary of the new development strategy by the Chinese government in recent years for China's development in future.But even so,it still needs to be reinterpreted in detail.
出处
《江海学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第1期123-129,共7页
Jianghai Academic Journal
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“经济快速增长条件下的社会发展战略:国际比较及其启示”(项目号:05JJD840142)的阶段性成果