1Haan M, Marks H. Stackelberg and Cournot competition under equilibrium limit pricing[J]. Journal of Economic Studies, 1996,23(5/6) :110 -- 127.
2Matsumura T. Cournot dupoly with multi2period competition: Inventory as a coordination device[J]. Australian Economic Papers, 1999, 38(3) : 189 -- 202.
3Huck S , Muller W, Normann H T. To commit or not to commit: Endogenous timing in experimental duopoly markets[J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 2002, 38(2) : 240 -- 264.
1Huck S,Muller W,Normann H T.To commit or not to commit:Endogenous timing in experimental duopoly markets[J].Games and Economic Behavior,2002,38(2):240-264.
2Sherali H,Soyster A,Murphy F.Stackelberg-Nash-Cournot equilibria:Characterization and computations[J].Operation Research,1983,31(2):253-276.
3Sherali H.A multiple leader Stackelberg model and analysis[J].Operation Research,1984,32 (2):390-404.
4Daughety A F.Beneficial concentration[J].American Economic Review,1990,80:1231-1237.
5Wolf D,Smeers Y.A stochastic version of a Stackelberg-Nash-Cournot equilibrium model[J].Management Science,1997,43(2):190-197.
6Cournot A A.Recherches sur les Principes Mathematiques de la Theorie des Richesses[M].In Libraire de Sciences Politiques et Sociale.M.Riviere & Cie,Paris,1838.
7Von Stackelberg H.Marktform und Gleichgewicht[M].Vienna and Berlin:Julius Springer Verlag,1934.
8Gal-Or E.First mover and second mover advantages[J].International Economic Review,1985,26(3):649-653.
9Dowrick S.Von Stackelberg and Comnot duopoly:Choosing roles[J].Rand Journal of Economics,1986,17(2):251-260.
10Muceller D.First mover advantages and path dependence[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization,1997,15(6):827 -850.
