期刊文献+

从反馈类型看国外二语写作纠错性反馈实验研究的差异 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 近三十年来,国外有关第二语言写作中纠错性反馈效果的实验研究因研究中变量的复杂性而往往得出不同的结果。借鉴国外外语教学界的研究成果,探讨符合我国国情的纠错方式是目前我国外语教学和研究领域关注的问题。文章回顾了国外关于第二语言写作教学中书面纠错性反馈效果的实验研究中的反馈类型的差异,旨在促进我们在该领域的研究和教学实践。
作者 杨华芬
出处 《常州工学院学报(社会科学版)》 2009年第6期106-109,共4页 Journal of Changzhou Institute of Technology(Social Science Edition)
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Ferris D. Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Wriring[ M]. Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press,2002.
  • 2Keh C L. Feedback in the Writing Process: A Model and Methods for Implementation [ J ]. ELT Journal, 1990,44 ( 4 ) : 294 - 304.
  • 3Truscott J. The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes[ J]. Language Learning, 1996,46:327 - 369.
  • 4James C. Errors in Language Learning and Use: Exploring Error Analysis [ M ]. New York: Addison-Wesley Longman Inc., 1998.
  • 5Ferris D. The Case for Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes:A Response to Truscott (1996) [J ].Journal of Second Language Writing, 1999,8 ( 1 ) : 1 - 11.
  • 6Ferris D. The" Grammar Correction" Debate in L2 Writing: Where are We, and Where Do We Go from Here and What Do We Do in the Meantime[J]. Journal of Second Language Writing,2004,13:49 -62.
  • 7Truscott J, Hsu A. Error Correction, Revision, and Learning[ J 1. Journal of Second Language Writing,2008,17:292 - 305.
  • 8郭翠红,秦晓晴.国外二语学习者作文书面反馈研究——研究的视角及对大学英语作文评改的启示[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2006,29(5):59-63. 被引量:104
  • 9Semke H D. The Effects of the Red Pen[ J]. Foreign Language Annals, 1984,17 : 195 - 202.
  • 10Ashwell T. Patterns of Teacher Response to Student Writing in A Multiple-draft Composition Classroom: Is Content Feedback Followed by Form Feedback the Best Method? [ J]. Journal of Second Language Writing,2000,9:227 - 257.

二级参考文献50

  • 1邱兆杰.EFL教学中的纠错问题——学习者的看法和要求[J].外语界,1997(2):42-46. 被引量:77
  • 2杨敬清.提高英语写作评改有效性的反馈机制──实验与分析[J].外语界,1996(3):41-45. 被引量:170
  • 3陈海.大学英语写作练习的评改[J].外语界,1994(3):43-46. 被引量:58
  • 4Ashwell,T.Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom:Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method?[J].Journal of Second Language Writing,2000,9 (3):227 -257.
  • 5Caulk,N.Comparing teacher and student responses to written work[J].TESOL Quarterly,1994,28 (1):181-188.
  • 6Chandler,J.The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing[J].Journal of Second Language Writing,2003,12 (3):267-296.
  • 7Chaudron,C.The effects of feedback on students' composition revisions[J].RELC Journal,1984,15 (2):1 -14.
  • 8Cohen,A.D.Student processing of feedback on their composition[C] //A.D.Wenden & J.Ruben.Learner Strategies in Language Learning.Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice Hall,1987:57-69.
  • 9Cohen,A.D.& M.C.Cavalcanti.Feedback on compositions:Teacher and student verbal reports[C] //Barbara Kroll.Second Language Writing:Research Insights for the Classroom.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1990:155-177.
  • 10Connor,U.& K.Asenavage.Peer response groups in ESL writing classes:How much impact on revision?[J].Journal of Second Language Writing,1994,3 (3):257 -276.

共引文献148

同被引文献9

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部