期刊文献+

个体特质性调节焦点的测量方法研究

Measurement Research of Chronic Regulatory Focus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前,学界对于特质性调节焦点测量量表的使用并没有形成共识,提出一个公认的量表,只是B IS/BAS量表以大脑功能和人格特质为测量基础,RFQ量表以成就动机模型为测量基础等,且不同量表考察的角度有所不同,有的关注个体的价值观,有的关注个体为达到目标而采用的方式和策略。为此,建议以调节焦点理论为支撑,开发适合我国文化特点的测量指标,同时在量表的维度和题项的开发上要考虑中西方文化的差异,运用调节焦点理论和工具对个体的行为表现进行评估和预测。 At present, there is no clear consensus as to which scale is the generally accepted one. With BIS/BAS questionnaire based on measuring different brain functions and personal characteristics, RFQ questionnaire on distinct achievement motivational models, some others scales on individual values, means or strategies adopted to obtain targets, different scales have their own approaches. It is recommended to develop measure tools suitable for Chinese culture. While cultural differences between western and Chinese cultures should be considered in developing dimensions and scale items of the scale, regulatory focus theories and tools could be used in evaluating and predicting individual performance.
作者 史青
出处 《西南交通大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2010年第1期61-65,共5页 Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University(Social Sciences)
关键词 特质性调节焦点 提升焦点 防御焦点 人格特质 BIS/BAS量表 RFQ量表 RWS量表 chronic regulatory focus promotion focus prevention focus personal characteristic BIS/BAS questionnaire RFQ questionnaire RWS questionnaire
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Gray, J. A. The Psychophysiological Basis of lintroversion- extraversion : A Modification of Eysenck's Theory [ C ]//In V. D. Nebylitsyn & J. A. Gray ( Eds. ). The Biological bases of Individual Behavior. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1972:182 - 155,156 - 195,196 -205.
  • 2Gray,J. A. A Critique of Eysenck's Theory of Personality[ C ]//H. J. Eysenck (Ed.). A Model for Personality. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1981:246 - 249,250 - 264,265 - 276.
  • 3Gray, J. A. The Neuropsychology of Anxiety: An Enquiry Into the Functions of the Septo-hippocampal System [ M ]. New York : Oxford University Press, 1982:221 - 321.
  • 4Gray, J. A. The Psychology of Fear and Stress [ M]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1957 : 156 - 172.
  • 5Gray, J. A. Brain Systems That Mediate both Emotion and Cognition[ J]. Cognition and Emotion, 1990, (4) : 269 - 288.
  • 6Higgins E T. Beyond Pleasure and Pain [J]. American Psychologist, 1997, ( 52 ) : 1280 - 1291,1291 -1300.
  • 7Higgins E T. Making a Good Decision : Value from Fit [ J]. American Psychologist,2000, (55) : 1217 - 1230.
  • 8Higgins E T, Friedman R S, Harlow R E, et al. Achievement Orientations from Subjective Histories of Success : Promotion Pride Versus Prevention Pride [J]. European Journal of Social Psychology,2001, ( 31 ) :3 - 23.
  • 9Dholakia , U. M. , Gopinath, M. , Bagozzi , R. P. , & Nataraajan, R. The Role of Regulatory Focus in the Experience and Self-Control of Desire for Temptations [ J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2006,16 ( 2 ) : 163 - 169, 170 - 175.
  • 10Fowles , D . C . Application of a Behavioral Theory of Motivation to the Concepts of Anxiety and lmpulsivity [ J]. Journal of Research in Personality, 1987, (21) :417 -435.

二级参考文献15

  • 1Alvero A M, Bucklin B R, Austion J. An objective review of the effectiveness and essential characteristics of performance feedback in organizational settings (1985 ~ 1998). Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 2001, 21: 3~29
  • 2Ilgen D R, Fisher C D, Taylor M S. Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979, 64(4): 349~374
  • 3Balcazar F, Hopkins B L, Suarez Y A. critical objective review of performance feedback. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 1985, 7:65~89
  • 4Podsakoff P M, Farch J F, Effects of feedback sign and credibility on goal setting and task performance: A preliminary test of some control theory propositions. Academy of management Proceedings, 1986. 198~202
  • 5Nease A A, Mudgett B O, Quifiones M A, Relationships among feedback sign, self-efficacy, and acceptance of performance feedback . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1999,84(5): 806~814
  • 6Waldersee R, Luthans F. The impact of positive and corrective feedback on customer service performance.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1994, 15:83~95
  • 7Podsakoff P M, Farch J F. Effects of feedback sign and credibility on goal setting and task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1989, 44: 45~67
  • 8Vance R J, Colella A. Effects of two types of feedback on goal acceptance and personal goal. Journal of Applied Psychology,1990, 75:68~76
  • 9Higgins E T. Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 1997, 52:1280~1300
  • 10Higgins E T. Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Pchologist, 2000, 13:141~154

共引文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部