期刊文献+

64层螺旋CTA评价颅颈部动脉狭窄的临床研究 被引量:20

Clinical research of evaluation of cerebral and carotid arterious stenosis with 64-slice spiral CTA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的以DSA结果为对照标准,评价64层螺旋头颈血管CTA判断不同程度狭窄的准确性。方法搜集临床怀疑颅颈部动脉狭窄性病变患者27例,均行头颈血管CTA检查,并在一周内行DSA检查,将CTA与DSA结果对照,评价64层CTA诊断头颈部动脉狭窄的准确性。结果以双侧颈、椎动脉为观察对象,共观察108支血管。CTA显示不同程度狭窄的血管段共115段;DSA显示不同程度狭窄的血管段共108段。64层CTA对颈、椎动脉狭窄总的诊断敏感度分别为97.70%、93.75%,特异度分别为99.51%、99.57%。结论64层螺旋CT头颈血管CTA无创,快捷,简单易行,能够清晰显示颅颈部动脉狭窄性病变,具有较高的敏感性与特异性。 Objective Compared with DSA results, evaluation of the accuracy of the carotid arterious stenosal degree with 64-slice spiral CTA. Methods Compile 27 borderline cases with cerebral and carotid arterious stenosis, which undergoing cerebral and carotid CTA examination and DSA examination in one week. Compared with DSA, appreciate accuracy of 64-slice CTA in diagnosis of cerebral and carotid arterious stenosis. Results Bilateral carotid, vertebral artery were observation object, total 108 branches. Various arterious stenosis diagnosed by CTA were 115 segment, DSA 108 segment. Sensitivity of 64-slice CTA in diagnosis carotid and vertebral arterious stenosis is respectively 97.70%, 93.75%, specialty is respectively 99.51%, 99.57%. Conclusion As a non-invasive and quick method, 64-slice CT angiography in cerebral and carotid arteries can display clearly cerebral and carotid arterious stenosis,which has a high sensitivity and specificity.
出处 《中国CT和MRI杂志》 2010年第1期17-21,共5页 Chinese Journal of CT and MRI
关键词 64层CT DSA 颈动脉 椎动脉 64-slice CT DSA carotid artery vertebral artery
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1张兆琪,马晓海.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像——无创性冠状动脉检查的新纪元[J].中华放射学杂志,2006,40(8):789-791. 被引量:88
  • 2SameshimaT, FutamiS, MoritaY, et al. Clinical usefulness of and problems with three-dimensional CT angiography for the evaluation of ateriosclerotic stenosis of the carotid artery: comparison with convention angiography, MRh, and ultrasound sonography[J].Surg Neurol, 1999,51(3):301-2309.
  • 3Marcus CD, Ladam Marcus VJ, Bigot JL, etal. Carotid arterial stenosis: evaluation at CT angiography with the volume-rendering technique[J]. Radiology, 1999,211(3):775-780.
  • 4Bsrol CJ, Dr C. Miller Fisher and the history of carotid artery disease [J]. Stroke, 1996,27(3):559-566.
  • 5Silvennoinen HM, Ikonen S, Soinne L, et al. CT angiographic analysis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of manual assessment, semiautomatic vessel analysis, and digital subtraction angiography[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2007 , 28 (1) : 97-103.
  • 6Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F,et al. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography[J]. Radiology, 2001,220(1):179-85.
  • 7Estes JM, Quist WC, Lo Gerfo FW, et al. Noninvasive characterization of plaque morphology using helical computed tomography[J]. J Cardiovasc Surg, 1998,39(5): 527 534.
  • 8Oliver TB, Lammie CA, Wright AR, et al. Atherosclerotic plaque at the carotid bifurcation: CT angiographic appearance with histopatbologic correlation[J], Am J Neuroradiol, 1999,20(5): 897 901.
  • 9Cinat M, Lane CT, Pham H, et al. Helical CT angiography in the preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis[J]. J Vasc Surg, 1998,28(2): 290 297.
  • 10Streifler JY, Eliaziw M, Fox AJ, et al. Angiographic detection of carotid plaque ulceration: comparison with surgical observations in a multicenter study [J]. Stroke, 1994, 25(6): 1130 1132.

二级参考文献31

共引文献135

同被引文献175

引证文献20

二级引证文献111

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部