3Ercikan,K.Linking Statewide Tests to the National Assessment of Educational Progress:Accuracy of Combining Test Results across States. Applied Measurement in Education . 1997
4U.S.Department of Education.The Nation’s Report Card2007//Trial Urban District Assessment Results at Grade4and8. . 2007
5Mathematics Framework for the2009National Assessment of Educational Progress. http://nagb.org/frameworks/reading2009.pdf .
6Jago,C.A History of NAEP Assessment Frameworks. the20th Anniversary of the National Assessment Governing Board 1988-2008 . 2009
7NAGB.Item Development and Review.Policy Statement. . 2002
8Hombo,C.M.NAEP and No Child Left Behind:Technical Challenge and Practical Solutions. Theory Into Practice . 2003
2Robert Rothman, Jean B. Slattery, and Jennifer L. Vranek. 2002. Benchmarking and Alignment of Standards and Testing. CSE Technical Report 566 [DB/OL]. http://www, cse. ucla. edu.
3Stephen Chappuis, Richard Stiggins, Judith Arter, and Jan Chappuis. Assessment For Learning. Portland, OR: Assessment Training Institute [E]. 2005.
4Mien Segers, Filip Dochy and Educardo Cascallar. Optimising New Models of Assessment: In Search of Qualities and Standards [Z]. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2003. 3.
5No Child Left Behind Issue Brief: A Guide to Standards-based Assessment 2000 [DB/OL]. http:// www. ecs. org/ clearinghouse.
7Hansche. Meeting the Requirements of Title I: Handbook for the development of Performances Standards [Z]. Washington, DC: Council of Chief States School Officers. 1998.
8Robert Rothman, Jean B Slat tery, Jennifer L Vranek. Benchmarking and Alignment of Stand- ards and Testing [ Z]. CSE Technical Report 566. 2002.
9Council of Chief State School Officers.Alignment Analysis and Assistance toERIC. 2002. Models forStates [Z].
10Webb N L. Alignment of Science and Mathematics Standards and Assessments in Four States [Z]. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. 1999.
