论图书馆学研究范式的历史演进及其当代建构

On the Historical Revolution and Contemporary Construction of the Research Paradigm of Library Science

在重点反思实在论范式和价值论范式不足的基础上,文章提出实践论范式应成为当代图书馆学研究的范式选择。实在论范式强调客观的抽象本质,意义成为先于理解的存在,个性差异因不符合规律而遭到贬损和否定,从而也抑制了人的主观能动性,图书馆工作成为模具化的麻木的物化过程。价值论范式消解了规律,但也解构了意义的确定性,导致个体意识的张扬和共性原则的缺失,直接造成图书馆学的混乱和无序。实践论范式的哲学基础是马克思主义实践哲学,它把人类文化交往活动视为图书馆的宏大背景,关注每一个"我"的具体图书馆实践,同时又强调客体对象和他者主体对"我"的规约。由此,知识真理成为依附于特定实践对象和社会关系的存在,从而实现了对实在论范式和价值论范式的双重颠覆。

On the base of reflection on the shortage of realism paradigm and axiology paradigm, this paper puts forward that the practice paradigm should become the paradigm selection of contemporary library science research. Realism paradigm emphasizes the abstract essence of objectivity and the significance existence ahead of understanding. In addition, belittled and negated personal difference resists the human subjective initiative because it doesn＇t conform to the law. Thus the jobs of li- brary become molded and numb materialized process. Axiology paradigm dispels the laws and deconstructs the determinacy of significance, which leads to the publicity of individual consciousness and lack of common principle, whose direct result is the confusion and disorder of library science. Practice paradigm whose philosophy basis is marxist practical philosophy regards human cultural intercourse activity as the grand background of library and focuses the specific library practice of every ＇T＇, at the same time, it also emphasizes stipulations on ＂me＂ from the object target and the otherness subject , which brings about the fact that knowledge truth has become existence depending on the specific practical objects and social relations, furthermore implementing double subversion to the realism paradigm and axiology paradigm.