期刊文献+

基于Rasch模型的翻译测试效度研究 被引量:28

Validation of a Translation Exam Based on Rasch Measurement Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文运用多面Rasch模型,从考生、评分员和评分项三个方面对一次英语篇章翻译测试的效度进行了研究。结果表明:①考生能力具有显著差异。但是,部分考生的内部答题行为不一致:1.33%的考生未发挥出实际水平,7.34%的考生出现了超常发挥的现象,3%的考生则可能未译完;②评分员的严厉度存在显著差异,但他们的评分均具有良好的内部一致性;③评分项的难度存在显著差异,区分度也较合理。总乏,这次测试整体上具有良好的效度,但考生的表现值得进一步研究。 This study investigates the validity of an English text translation exam from three perspectives: examinees, raters, and rating items by implementing Many-facet Rasch Measurement Model. Results indicate that ① exami- nees are significantly different in ability, but some examinees display inconsistency in translating. 1.33% of the examinees do not bring their competence into full play when translating some sentences, 7.34% of the examinees translate some sentences unexpectedly well, and 3% of the examinees may not finish all the sentences; ②raters have significantly different severity, but their rating has good internal self-consistency; ③ rating items are significantly different in difficulty, and they differentiate the examinees well. In general, this study provides evidence for the good validity of the translation exam, but the performance of examinees needs further study.
出处 《外语电化教学》 CSSCI 2010年第1期14-18,共5页 Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“大规模考试主观题(英汉互译)自动评分系统的研制”(批准号:07JJD740070)的资助
关键词 多面RASCH模型 翻译 效度 Many-facet Rasch Measurement Model Translation Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing [Z ]. Washington, D. C. : American Educational Research Association,1999.
  • 2Bachman, L. F. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing [ M ]. Oxford : Oxford University Press.上海:上海外语教育出版社,1990.
  • 3Bachman, L. F. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing [ M ]. Oxford : Oxford University Press.上海:上海外语教育出版社,1999.
  • 4Bachman, L. F. Statistical Analyses for Language Assessment [ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press,2004.
  • 5Banerji, M. Construct validity of scores/measures from a developmental assessment of mathematics using classical and Many-Facet Rasch Measurement[J]. Journal of Applied Measurement,2000,1 (2) :177 - 198.
  • 6Bonk, W. J. & Ockey, G. J. A many-facet Rasch analysis of the second language group oral discussion task [ J ]. Language Testing, 2003,20(1 ) :89 - 110.
  • 7Eckes, T. & Grotjahn, R. A closer look at the construct validity of C- tests[ J]. Language Testing,2006,23 (3) :290 - 325.
  • 8Eckes, T. Examining rater effects in TestDaF writing and speaking performance assessments : A many-facet Rasch analysis [ J ]. Language Assessment Quarterly,2005,2 ( 3 ) : 197 - 221.
  • 9Elder, C. , Barkhuizen, G. , Knoch, U. & Von Randow, J. Evaluating rater responses to an online training program for L2 writing assessment[ J]. Language Testing,2007,24( 1 ) :37 -64.
  • 10Hoyt, W. T. & Kerns, M. D. Magnitude and moderators of bias in observer ratings : A meta-analysis [ J]. Psychological Methods, 1999, 4:403 - 424.

二级参考文献106

共引文献226

同被引文献271

引证文献28

二级引证文献106

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部