期刊文献+

多媒体式写作任务测试难度特征及对EFL写作的影响 被引量:2

Difficulty of the Multimedia Task-based Writing Test and Its Influence on EFL Writing
原文传递
导出
摘要 近年来,任务型测试受到越来越多的关注,而将听、读、写结合起来的写作任务也逐渐开始在写作考试中实施。本文作者对视听、阅读与写作相结合的多媒体式写作测试进行了实证研究,并介入其它两种写作测试,比较不同写作任务受试的写作表现,调查受试对任务难度的感知、受试的心理负担、完成任务中的表现、以及对任务的兴趣与完成动机等;探究这些因素与写作总体表现以及准确度,流利度和复杂度等三方面得分之间的关系。研究结果表明,不同写作任务对写作表现有显著影响;多媒体式写作测试组的受试在总体表现和写作的流利度和复杂度上均优于其它组受试;同其它组受试相比,该组受试有更强的写作兴趣与写作动机;兴趣与动机与写作表现呈显著正相关,心理负担与写作表现呈显著负相关,而受试对任务难度的感知和对自我写作表现的评定与测试结果无显著相关性。 ting listening, In recent years, task-based language testing received increasing recognition and the writing task integrareading with writing has been used as a test format. The writers conducted an experimental research on the task-based writing test integrating listening, watching, reading with writing ( multimedia type) and compared the subjects' performance with that of the other two types of writing tests. The subjects' self-assessment of the tasks as well as the relationship between their self-assessment and actual performance is also investigated. The research results show that different writing tasks have significant influence on students' writing performance. The students taking multimedia writing test performed comparatively better than those taking other two writing tests in general as well as in writing fluency and complexity, and they are more interested in their task and have stronger motivation to accomplish it. The findings further reveal that writing performance is positively related to interest and motivation but negatively to stress. And the subjects' self-assessment of task difficulty and performance has no significant relation with test results.
作者 曾路 伍忠杰
出处 《外语电化教学》 CSSCI 2010年第1期48-51,共4页 Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education
基金 西南民族大学2008年人才引进项目资金资助
关键词 多媒体 写作任务测试 难度特征 写作表现 Multimedia Task-Based Writing Test Task Difficulty Writing Performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Bachman, L. F. Some reflections on task-based language performance assessment [ J ]. Language Testing,2002,19,4.
  • 2Bygate, M. , Skehan, P. &Swain, M. (eds.) Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching and Testing[ M ]. Oxford : Oxford University Press ,2001.
  • 3Cook , V. Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition [ M ]. London : Macmillan, 1993.
  • 4Ellis, R. Task-based Language Learning and Teaching[ M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,2003.
  • 5Elder C. , Iwashita N. , McNamara T. Estimationg the difficulty of oral proficiency tasks: what does the test-taker have to offer[ J]. Language Testing, 2002,19,4.
  • 6Honeyfield, J. Responding to task difficulty: What is involved in adjusting the relationship between learners and learning experiences [ A ]. In M. L. Tickoo ( ed. ). Simplification : Theory and Applications[ C]. Singapore: SEAM EO Regional,1993.
  • 7Nunan, D. Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom [ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1989.
  • 8Nunan, D. Task-based syllabus design: Selecting, grading, and sequencing tasks[A]. In G. V. C rookes & S. M. Gass(eds. ) , Tasks in a Pedagogical Context: Integrating Theory and Practice[ C ]. Clevedon, Avon: M ultilingual Matters,1993.
  • 9Robinson, P. Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production : exploring interactions in a componential framework [ J ]. Applied Linguistics ,2001,22,1.
  • 10Skehan, P. A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning [ M ]. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, 1998.

二级参考文献27

  • 1陈慧媛,吴旭东.任务难度与任务条件对EFL写作的影响[J].现代外语,1998,21(2). 被引量:103
  • 2阮周林.第二语言学习中回避现象分析[J].外语教学,2000,21(1):19-23. 被引量:78
  • 3Crookes, G. 1989. "Planning and interlanguage variation". Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11/3: 367-383.
  • 4Crookes, G. 1990. "The utterance, and the other basic units for second language discourse analysis~. Applied Linguistics 11 : 183-199.
  • 5Doughty, C. 1991. "Second language instruction does make a difference, evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization". Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13/4 : 431 - 470.
  • 6Ellis, R. 1987. "Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: style shifting in the use of the past tense". Studies in Second Language Acquisition 9 ; 12-20.
  • 7Foster, P. & P. Skehan. 1996. "The influence of planning and task type on second language performanee ". Studies in Second language Acquisition 18:299-323.
  • 8Long, M. 1991. "Focus on form: a design feature in language teaching". In K. de Bot, R.B. Ginsberg & C. Kramsch ( eds. ). Foreign Language Research in Cross-cultural Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 9Perron, J. 1977. "Written syntactic complexity and the modes of discourse'. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
  • 10Schachter, J. 1974. "An error in error analysis". Language Learning 24 : 205- 214.

共引文献139

同被引文献50

  • 1Baltova I.The impact of video on the comprehension skills of core French students[].Canadian Modern Language Review.1994
  • 2Guichon N,Mclornan S.The effects of multimodality on L2learners:Implications for CALL resource design[].System.2008
  • 3Ockey G J.Construct implications of including still image or video in computer-based listening tests[].Language Testing.2007
  • 4Ginther,A.Context and content visuals and performance on listening comprehension stimuli[].Language Testing.2002
  • 5Gruba,P.A comparison study of audio and video in language testing[].Jalt Journal.1993
  • 6Ai,H.&X.Lu.2013.A corpus-based comparison of syntactic complexity in NNS and NSuniversity students writing[A].In A.Díaz-Negrillo,N.Ballier&P.Thompson(eds.).Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data[C].Amsterdam:John Benjamins.249-264.
  • 7Biber,D.,B.Gray&K.Poonpon.2011.Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2writing development?[J].TESOL Quarterly45:5-35.
  • 8Bulté,B.&A.Housen.2014.Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2writing complexity[J].Journal of Second Language Writing26:42-65.
  • 9Chan,H.,M.Verspoor&L.Vahtrick.2015.Dynamic development in speaking versus writing in identical twins[J].Language Learning65:298-325.
  • 10Crossley,S.&D.McNamara.2014.Does writing development equal writing quality?Acomputational investigation of syntactic complexity in L2learners[J].Journal of Second Language Writing26:66-79.

引证文献2

二级引证文献79

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部