期刊文献+

自发特质推理中的社会刻板效应 被引量:7

Stereotype Effects on Spontaneous Trait Inferences
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近来,考察自发特质推理中的社会刻板效应,成为自发特质推理研究的一个新趋势。在介绍自发特质推理及其研究范式的基础上,概述了刻板印象与特质的概念联系,并阐明了考察自发特质推理中的社会刻板效应的理论依据和方法。接着,对自发特质推理中的职业、种族和性别刻板效应研究进行了回顾,发现刻板印象对自发特质推理的影响主要通过它对自发特质推理的阻碍作用体现出来,在高认知负荷下,这种阻碍作用更为明显。最后,从研究对象、研究方法、研究内容三个方面对该领域的研究进行了评价和展望。 Spontaneous trait inferences are trait inferences that occur unintentionally, almost effortlessly, and usually without awareness. Recently, spontaneous trait inferences become an important topic of research for social cognition. In the past few yeas, a new research trend has been developed to describe the cognition phenomenon of spontaneous trait inferences. By examining the impact of implicit stereotypes on spontaneous trait inferences, researchers gained access to a new level of understanding on it. They provided evidences for the influence of automatically activated stereotypes, including occupation stereotypes, race stereotype and gender stereotypes on the process of spontaneous trait inferences. After a brief introduction of the theoretical basis for researchers to explore the stereotype effects on spontaneous trait inferences, the present paper systematically reviewed some studies related to this topic. In the end, three prospects for the future research were pointed out.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第2期356-364,共9页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 山东省"泰山学者"建设工程专项经费(鲁政办发(2004)91号) 山东省"十一五"强化建设重点学科建设经费(鲁教研字(2006)4号)资助
关键词 自发特质推理 内隐刻板印象 社会刻板效应 探测词再认范式 spontaneous trait inference implicit stereotype stereotype effect recognition probe paradigm
  • 相关文献

参考文献49

二级参考文献60

  • 1朱新秤,焦书兰.国外关于自发特质推理的研究综述[J].心理科学进展,1998,8(3):30-33. 被引量:10
  • 2蔡华俭,杨治良.大学生性别自我概念的结构[J].心理学报,2002,34(2):168-174. 被引量:56
  • 3蔡华俭,周颖,史青海.内隐联想测验(IAT)及其在性别刻板印象研究中的应用[J].社会心理研究,2001(4):6-11. 被引量:36
  • 4[2]Allport. G. W. The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA:Addison- Wesley. 1954
  • 5[3]Bargh, J. A. The cognitive monster: The case against the controllability of automatic stereotype effects. In S.Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford. 1999:361 - 382
  • 6[4]Gaertner, S. L., & McLaughlin, J. P. Racial stereotypes:Associations and ascriptions of positive and negative characteristics. Social Psychology Quarterly, 1983,46:23 - 30
  • 7[5]Devine, P. G. Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989,56:5- 18
  • 8[6]Bargh, J. A. Thc four horsemcn of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition.In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition: Vol. 1. Basic processes (2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum. 1994:1 - 40
  • 9[7]Fein, S. & Spencer, S. J. Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997,73:31 -44
  • 10[8]Spencer, S. J., Fein, S., Wolfe, C. T., Fong, C. &Dunn, M. A. Automatic activation of stereotypes: The role of self- image threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1998, 24:1139 - 1152

共引文献208

同被引文献159

引证文献7

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部