三种篮球鞋足跟部压缩性能的比较研究

Compression Performance of Three Kinds of Basketball Shoes Heel

通过对3种篮球鞋足跟部压缩性能的进行比较研究,从而对不同篮球鞋鞋底缓冲减震功能进行科学评价。对1名篮球专业的大学生穿着3种国内外拥有顶尖技术的高端品牌篮球鞋(NIKE FLIGHT96、ADIDAS TS PROMODEL和ANTA"霸道"三代)在正常步行速度下的足底压力分布的测试,结合Instron材料力学试验机对3种不同类型的鞋底材料进行压缩试验,对相关数据进行分析。通过3双鞋压缩行为、能量吸收的特征和应力松弛的参数来比较和分析,在相同应力下,NIKE的应变最小,NIKE的模量和能量吸收最大,其次为ANTA和ADIDAS;在应力松弛的试验中,NIKE的应力松弛衰减度为最小,ANTA和ADIDAS几乎相同。

Objective： Through heel compression performance of three kinds of basketball shoes to cushion shock absorption capabilities for scientific evaluation. Methods： A basketball professiunal college student dressed in three kinds of high technology top brand basketball shoes made by home and abroad （NIKE FLIGHT96, ADIDAS TS PROMODEI, and ANTA ＂hegemony＂ three generations） in the normal walking speed distribulion of plantar pressure under the test, combined with Instron material testing machine mechanics of three different types of shoes materials compression test on the relevant data for analysis. Results： Three brand of shoes through the compression behavior, energy absorption characteristics and stress relaxation parameters for comparison and analysis, under the same stress, NIKE strain the smallest, NIKE＇s modulus and energy absorption maximum, followed hv ANTA and ADIDAS. in the stress relaxation experiment, NIKE stress relaxation attenuation to a minimum, ANTA mid ADIDAS ahnost the same. Discussion： Analysis of three pairs of shoes has diflerent compression performance reasons. Conclusions： NIKE described the advantages of the compression performance, and ADIDAS, and ANTA in compression perfnrmance deficiencies recommendations.