“见”不是虚化结果补语--谈词义演变与语法化的区别

Is Jiàn in V-jiàn a Grammaticalized Resultative Complement?——On the Differences between Semantic Change and Grammaticalization

及物动词"见"不是虚化结果补语,它从表示有结果的视觉动作,发展为表示其他感觉动作的有结果,以及一般动作的完成结束,是"见"自身词义的引申、扩展,是一种词义演变现象。"完、好、掉、住、成"等不及物动词,在结果补语位置上由句法结构重新分析(V+(OC)→(VO)C)而形成表示动作完结的语法范畴——虚化结果补语,是一种语法化现象。二者在词性、句法表现和句式来源等方面截然不同。

The author argues in this paper that the transitive verb jian （见） in the V-jian phrase is not a grammaticalized resultative complement. Its meaning of completion and conclusion is the extension of its original meaning to indicate the result of the visual action. It is considered as a phenomenon of a semantic change which is different from the intransitive verbs wan （ 完）, hao （好）, diao （掉）, zhu （ 住 ） and cheng （成） whose meanings change from ＂V ＋ （ OC ）＂ to ＂（VO） C＂ functioning as grammaticalized resuhative complement. The two phenomena are completely different in both syntactic performance and origin.