期刊文献+

早期应用替罗非班对行介入治疗的中高危急性冠脉综合征患者血小板聚集率和临床结果的影响 被引量:12

Observation of platelet aggregation rate and clinical outcomes of early tirofiban in the patients with moderate- and high- risk acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察早期应用替罗非班对行冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的中高危非ST段抬高性急性冠脉综合征(NSTEACS)患者的血小板聚集率(PAR)和临床结果的影响,从而评价其在PCI中的疗效和安全性。方法100例入院行PCI的中高危NSTEACS患者,随机分为早期应用替罗非班组(47例)和早期未应用替罗非班组(53例)。早期应用组在PCI术前至少4h静脉应用替罗非班。早期未应用组术前不使用替罗非班,术后可据临床情况使用,因此它包括PCI术后即刻应用替罗非班(32例)和PCI术后未应用(21例)两个亚组。所有患者入院后均口服阿司匹林、氯吡格雷、他汀类及皮下注射低分子肝素。观察两组PAR、PCI术前术后TIMI血流情况、出血事件与血小板减少症的发生率。结果与未用药相比,应用替罗非班12h后PAR明显下降(P〈0.01);与早期未应用替罗非班组的两亚组相比,早期应用组术前靶血管的TIMI血流3级的获得率明显较高(83.0%vs.60.0%vs.61.5%;P=0.045);术后靶血管的TIMI血流分级三组比较差异无统计学意义。两组出血与血小板减少症的发生率差异均无统计学意义。结论早期应用替罗非班可安全、有效地抑制PCI患者血小板聚集并改善PCI术前TIMI血流。 Objective To observe the platelet aggregation rate (PAR) and clinical outcomes of early tirofiban in the patients with moderate - and high -risk non -ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods One hundred NSTEACS patients treated with PCI were randomly divided into treatment group ( n = 47 ) and control group(n = 53). Tirofiban was used in the former group at least 4 hours before operation whereas tirofibn was not used before coronary angiography but the provisional use during or after PCI in the latter one. Therefore, the latter group was composed of two subgroups : tirofiban was used during or after PCI ( n = 32) and tirofiban was not used during or after PCI ( n = 21 ). Aspirin, clopidogrel, statin and low molecular weight heparin were given to all the patients. PAR, bleeding complications and thrombocytopenia were observed in both groups. Results Compared with the subgroups in which tirofiban was not used during or after PCI, PAR was much lower when tirofian was used for 12 hours either before or after PCI (P 〈 0. 01 ). Before PCI, TIMI 3 flow rate of the target vessel was significantly higher in treatment group than in control groups ( 83.0% vs. 60.0% vs. 61.5% ;P = 0. 045). However, TIMI 3 flow rate after PCI was not significantly different between treatment group and control groups. There was no significant difference in bleeding complications and thrombocytopenia between the two groups. Conclusion Among the patients with moderate - and high - risk non - ST elevation ACS treated with PCI, the early use of tirofiban was able to effectively and safely block the platelet aggregation and obtain a better patency (TIMI 3 flow).
出处 《中国急救医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第1期69-72,共4页 Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine
关键词 替罗非班 血管成形术 经腔 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 血小板聚集 Tirofiban Angioplasty Transluminal,percutaneous coronary intervention Platelet aggregation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1PRISM - PLUS Study Investigators. Inhibition of the platelet glycoprotein llb/Ilia receptor with tirofiban in unstable angina and non - Q - wave myocardial infarction[ J]. N Engl J Med, 1998, 338( 1 ) : 1488 - 1497.
  • 2The RESTORE Investigators. Effects of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade with tirofiban on adverse cardiac events in patients with un- stable angina or acute myocardial infarction under going coronary an- gioplasty[J]. Circulation,1997,96(4) :1445.
  • 3Chan AW, Moliterno D J, Berger PB, et al. Triple antiplatelet therapy during percutaneous coronary intervention Is associated with improved outcomes including one - year survival: results from the do tirofiban and reoPro give similar efficacy outcome trial (TARGET) [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003,42(7) :1188 -1195.
  • 4Bolognese L, Falsini G, Liistro F, et al. Randomized comparison of upstream tirofiban versus downstream high bolus dose tirofiban or abciximab on tissue - level, perfusion and troponin release in high - risk acute coro- nary syndromes treated with percutaneous coronary interventions: The EVEREST Trial[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2006,47(3):522 -528.
  • 5Stone GW, Bertrand ME, Moses JW, et al. Routine upstream initiation vs deferred selective use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: the ACUITY timing trial [ J ]. JAMA, 2007,297 (6) :591 - 602.
  • 6Giugliano RP, White JA, Bode C, et al. Early versus delayed, provisional eptifibatide in acute coronary syndromes[ J]. N Engl J Med, 2009,1:1 - 15.
  • 7Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non - ST - elevation myocardial infarction : a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practic Guidelines ( Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non - ST - Elevation Myocardial Infarction) developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular An- giography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons en- dorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency [ J ]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2007,50(7 ) :e1 -e157.
  • 8Ben- Dor Itsik, Kleiman NS, Lev Eli. Assessment, Mechanisms, and Clinical Implication of Variability in Platelet Response to Aspirin and Clopidogrel Therapy [ J ]. Am J Cardiol, 2009,22 (3) :81.
  • 9Kimmelstiel C, Badar J, Covic L, et al. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the platelet GPIIb/IIla inhibitor tirofiban in pa- tients undergoing percutaneons coronary intervention : implications for adjustment of tirofiban and clopidogre/ dosage [ J ]. Thrombosis Research,2005,116 ( 8 ) :55 - 66.
  • 10刘弢,谢英,周玉杰,马涵英,郭永和,李月平,成万军,刘宇扬,赵迎新,史冬梅.替罗非班应用时机对高危非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者近期临床预后的影响[J].解放军医学杂志,2009,34(2):131-134. 被引量:14

二级参考文献13

  • 1Silber S, Albertsson P, Aviles FF, et al. Guidelines for pereutancous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J, 2005, 26(8): 804.
  • 2The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings TIMI Study Group. N Engl J Med, 1985, 312(14): 932.
  • 3Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Murphy SA, et al. Relationship of TIMI myocardial perfusion grade to mortality after administration of throm bolytic drags Circulation, 2000, 101(2):125.
  • 4Valgimigli M, Percoco G, Beriberi D, et al. The additive value of tirofiban administered with the high-dose bolus in the prevention of ischemic complications during high risk coronary angioplasty: the AI)VANCE Trial. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2004, 44(1): 14.
  • 5Wyss CA, Roffi M. Platelet inhibition in percutaneous coronary interventions. Herz, 2005, 30(3)= I89.
  • 6Razakjr OA, Tan HC, Yip WL, et al. Predictors of bleeding complications and thrombocytopenia with the use of abciximab during percutaneous coronary intervention. J Interv Cardiol, 2005, 18(1): 33.
  • 7Bolognese L, Falsini G, Liistro F. Randomized comparison of upstream tirofiban versus downstream high bolus dose tirofiban or abdximab on tissue-level perfusion and troponin release in high-risk acute coronary syndromes treated with percutaneous coronary inteventions: the EVEREST trial. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2006, 47(3): 522.
  • 8Stone GW, Bertrand ME, Moses JW, et al. Routine upstream initia tion vs deferred selective use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in a cute coronary syndromes: the ACUITY Timing trial. JAMA, 2007 297(6): 591.
  • 9De Servi S, Mariani M, Vandoni P, ct al. Use of glycolarotein Ⅱb/Ⅲ a inhibitors in invasively-treated patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. J Cardiovasc IVied (Hagerstown), 2006, 7(3) : 159.
  • 10No authors listed. Effects of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade with tirofihan on adverse cardiac events in patients with unstable an gina or acute myocardial infarction undergoing coronary angioplasty. The RESTORE Investigators Randomized Efficacy Study of Tirofiban for Outcomes and RKstenosis. Circulation, 1997, 96(5): 1445.

共引文献13

同被引文献68

  • 1杨跃进.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中无再流的诊断、治疗和预防[J].中华心血管病杂志,2004,32(7):662-664. 被引量:57
  • 2蔡志雄,王晓青,陈平,朱稚丹,郭舜奇,罗燕华,徐荣和.高龄低危急性心肌梗死患者急诊行PCI与左室功能关系的临床研究[J].中国医师进修杂志(内科版),2006,29(8):24-25. 被引量:4
  • 3李月平,周玉杰,刘宇扬,张妍,梁静.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后替罗非班诱发极重度血小板减少症二例[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2006,14(5):315-315. 被引量:14
  • 4Thygesen K,Alpert JS, White HD. Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007,50 (22) :2173-2195.
  • 5Polonski L, Gasior M, Wasilewski J, et al. Outcomes of primary coronary angioplasty and angioplasty afer initial thrombolysis in the treatment of 374 consrcutive patients with acute myocardial Infatction. Am Heart J,2003,145 (5) :855-861.
  • 6Huynh T, Derron S, O' loughlin J, et al. Comparison of Primary, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Fibrinolytic Therapy in ST-Segment-Elvation Myocardial Infaretion. Circulation, 2009, 119(24) :3101-3109.
  • 7O'Neil WW. The reperfusion wars:where will be the next battle be fought Am J Med,2001,110( 1 ) :65-66.
  • 8Burzotta F, Trani C, Romagnoli E, et al. Manual thrombusaspiration improves myocardial reperfusion:the randomized evaluation of the effect of mechanical reduction of distal embolization by thrombus-aspiration in primary and rescue angioplasty ( REMEDIA ) trial. JACC ,2005,46 (2) :371-376.
  • 9Romano M, Buffoli F, Tomasi L,et al. The no-reflow phenomenonin acute myocardial infarction after primary angioplasty: incidence,predictive factors, and long-term outcomes [J]. J Cardiovasc Med,2008, 9(1): 59-63.
  • 10Hale SL, MehraA, Leeka J, et al. Post conditioning fails toimprove no reflow or alter infarct size in an open-chest rabbit modelof myocardial ischemia-reperfusion [ J ]. Am J Physiol Heart CircPhysiol, 2008, 294 (1) : H421- H425.

引证文献12

二级引证文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部