期刊文献+

不熟悉材料伴随熟悉类别标签时儿童的归纳推理

The Induction of Unfamiliar Materials with Familiar Category Labels
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对呈现在儿童面前的不熟悉的材料用儿童熟悉的、各不相同的类别标签命名之后,使儿童面临知觉相似和类别冲突的情形下,研究了儿童的归纳推理及其发展。研究结果显示,在此情形下,5岁儿童的归纳推理主要是基于知觉相似的,7岁儿童基于知觉相似和基于类别的归纳推理之间差异不显著,11岁儿童则主要基于类别进行归纳推理。 5-, 7-and ll-year-olds' induction was tested by the triad inductive task which used unfamiliar materials with familiar labels. The data showed that 1) when materials were unfamiliar to children but given familiar labels, 5-year-olds would mainly use similarity to support their induction and when materials were familiar to them would mainly use knowledge to make induction; 2) when materials were unfamiliar but given familiar labels, ll-year-olds would mainly use knowledge to support their induetion while 7-year-olds would use both similarity and knowledge to make generalization.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第1期71-73,82,共4页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30370488)的后续工作 西南大学基础心理学国家级重点学科项目(NSKD06007) 西南大学科技基金(SWUQ2006040)的部分工作
关键词 归纳推理 概念 知觉相似 信息贫乏 语言标签 induction, category, similarity, label effects
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Mandler J M, McDonough L. Drinking and driving don' t mix: Inductive generalization in infancy. Cognition, 1996, 59, 307 - 335.
  • 2Welder A, Graham S A. The influences of shape similarity and shared labels on infants' inductive inferences about nonobvious object properties. Child Development, 2001, 72, 1653- 1673.
  • 3Gelman S A, Markman E M. Categories and induction in young children. Cognition, 1986, 23:183-209.
  • 4Gelman S A. Psychological essentialism in children. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2004, 8 : 404 - 409.
  • 5Smith L B. A model of perceptual classification in children and adults. Psychological Review, 1989, 96, 125 - 144.
  • 6Smith L B, Jones S S, Landau B. Naming in young children: A dumb attentional mechanism? Cognition, 1996. 60: 143- 171.
  • 7Sloutsky V M, Lo Y F, Fisher A V. How much does a shared name make things similar: Linguistic labels and the development of inductive inference. Child Development, 2001, 72: 1695- 1709.
  • 8Sloutsky V M, Fisher A V. Induction and categorization in young children: A similarity - based model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2004, 133(2) : 166 -- 188.
  • 9龙长权,吴睿明,李红,陈安涛,冯廷勇,李富洪.3.5—5.5岁儿童在知觉相似与概念冲突情形下的归纳推理[J].心理学报,2006,38(1):47-55. 被引量:21
  • 10Sloutsky V M, Kloos H, Fisher A V. When looks are everything: Appearance similarity versus kind information in early induction. Psychological Science, 2007, 18 (2) ; 179- 185.

二级参考文献31

  • 1李红,陈安涛,冯廷勇,李富洪,龙长权.个体归纳推理能力的发展及其机制研究展望[J].心理科学,2004,27(6):1457-1459. 被引量:30
  • 2李富洪,李红,陈安涛,冯廷勇,高雪梅,张仲明,龙长权.物体颜色与质地相似度对幼儿归纳推理的影响[J].心理学报,2005,37(2):199-209. 被引量:12
  • 3陈安涛,李红,冯廷勇,高雪梅,张仲明,李富洪,杨东.分段设计条件下归纳推理的多样性效应[J].中国科学(C辑),2005,35(3):275-283. 被引量:13
  • 4龙长权,吴睿明,李红,陈安涛,冯廷勇,李富洪.对以类别为基础的归纳推理的几种理论模型的评价[J].心理科学进展,2005,13(5):596-605. 被引量:7
  • 5Sloutsky V M, Fisher A V. When development and learning decrease memory: evidence against category-based induction in children.Psychological science, 2004,15(8) :553-558.
  • 6Jean M. Mandler, Perceptual and Conceptual Processes in Infancy.Joural of cognition and development,2000, 1:3-36.
  • 7Heit E, Hahn U. Diverslty-based reasoning in children. Cognitive psychology, 2001,43:243-273.
  • 8Waxman S, Lynch E, Casey K, Baer L. Setters and Samoyeds : the emergence of subordinate level categories as a basic for inductive inference in preschool-age children. Development psychology, 1997,33(6) :1074 - 1090.
  • 9Gelman S A. The development of induction within natural kind and artifact categories. Cognitive Psychology, 1988,20:65 - 95.
  • 10Gelman S A, O'Reilly A W. Children's inductive inferences within super ordinate categories: The role of language and category structure. Child Development, 1988,59:876 - 887.

共引文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部