期刊文献+

四重模型:结构、算法与应用 被引量:2

The Quad Model:Its Structure,Algorithm and Application
下载PDF
导出
摘要 四重模型(The Quadruple Process Model,简称Quad Model)是一个可对内隐任务中四种性质不同加工的独立、同时性影响进行测量的多项式模型。首先采用武器识别任务等实例对模型参数、结构、数据分析及可行性进行说明;随后介绍该模型在内隐研究中的应用,涉及情境易变性与可塑性、个体与群体差异及内隐任务外行为等三类问题;最后从多方面对其进行评价与展望。 The Quadruple process model is a multi-nomial model that can measur the independent and simultaneous sntluences or iour qualitatively distinct processes in the implicit task. Firstly, this article illustrates the parameter, structure, data analysis and validation of the quad model by citing examples such as a weapon identification task and so on. Secondly, it describes the applications of the quad model in implicit studies, which includes three main problems: the contextual variability and malleability, individual and group differences, and extra-task behavior. Finally, it makes an evaluation and prediction of the quad model from several aspects.
作者 侯静 王沛
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第1期162-164,143,共4页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 上海市2008年度哲学社会科学一般项目(BW0818) 上海市2008年度曙光计划项目(CW0908) 上海市教委科研创新项目(CW0951) 北京师范大学认知神经与学习国家重点实验室开放基金 上海市重点学科建设项目资助(S30401)
关键词 自动化加工 控制性加工 四重模型 automatic processing, controlled processing, the quad model
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R M. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 1977, 84, 1- 66.
  • 2Sherman, J W. On building a better process model: It's not only how many, but which ones and by which means. Psychological Inquiry, 2006a, 17, 173-184.
  • 3Conrey, F R., Sherman, J W. , Gawronski, B., et al. Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: The Quad model of implicit task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2005, 89, 469-487.
  • 4Sherman, J W., Gawronski, B., Gonsalkorale, K., et al. The self- regulation of automatic associations and behavioral impulses. Psychological Review, 2008, 115, 314- 335.
  • 5Sherman, J W. Clearing up some misconceptions about the quad model. Psychological Inquiry, 2006b, 17, 269-270.
  • 6Payne, B K. Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001, 81, 181 - 192.
  • 7Bishara, A J., & Payne, B K. Multinomial Process Tree Models of Control and Autornaticity in Weapon Misidentification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2008.
  • 8Britton, J C., Taylor, S F., Sudheimer, K D., et al. Facial expression.s and complex lAPS pictures: Common and differential networks. Neurolmage, 2006, 31, 906-919.
  • 9Gonsalkorale, K., von Hippel, W., Sherman, J W., et al. Bias and regulation of bias in intergroup interactions: Implicit attitudes toward Muslims and interaction quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2009, 45, 161- 166.
  • 10Govan, C L., & Willianls. K D. Changing the affective valence of the stimulus items influences the IAT by redefining the eategory labels. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2004, 40, 357 - 365.

同被引文献24

  • 1陈慧媛.关于语言僵化现象起因的理论探讨[J].外语教学与研究,1999,31(3):39-45. 被引量:309
  • 2高云,朱景梅.语言石化现象的产生及防止策略[J].外语教学,2005,26(3):41-43. 被引量:53
  • 3赵萱.中介语石化现象与中介语心理认知机制浅探[J].外语与外语教学,2006(3):18-20. 被引量:94
  • 4Amodio, D. M., & Devine, P. G. (2006). Stereotyping and evaluation in implicit race bias: Evidence for independent constructs and unique effects on behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 652-661.
  • 5Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of muhinomial process tree modeling. Psyehonomic Bulletin and Review, 6(1), 57-86.
  • 6Bishara, A. J., & Keith, P. B. (2009). Multinomial process tree models of control and automaticity in weapon misidentification. Journal of ExpeffmentM Social Psychology, 45(3), 524-534.
  • 7Blair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Soeial Psychology Re,4ew, 6(3), 242-261.
  • 8Conrey, F. R., Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., Hugenberg, K., & Groom, C. J. (2005). Separating multiple processes in implicit social cooaition: The quad model of implicit task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 469-487.
  • 9De Houwer, J. (2009). Comparing measures of attitudes at the functional and procedural levels. In R. E. Petty, R. H. Fazio & P. Brinol (Eds.), Anitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures (pp. 361-390). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • 10Deutsch, R., & Gawranski, B. (2009). When the method makes a difference: Antagonistic effects on "automatic evaluations" as a function of task characteristics of the measure. Journal of Expm4mental Social Psychology,45(1), 101-114.

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部