期刊文献+

论清代黔东南苗寨的纠纷解决——以文斗苗寨词状为对象的研究 被引量:10

Brief Analyses of Disputes Settlement in Miao Minorities of Southeaster QIAN District in Qing Dynasty——Taking Legislation Documents of Verbal Struggle of Resident Place of Miao Minorities as Focus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 清代黔东南因为林木买卖的繁荣,经济不断发展,民间的纠纷增多,衍生了黔东南独特的纠纷解决过程。以文斗的词状文书为对象的研究显示了在纠纷的解决过程中,有不同的解纷方式,即神明裁判,官府审理,第三方主持下的调解。在纠纷的解决中,不同主体有不同的态度。官府一般将自己摆在一个第三者的地位,不主动插手民间的纠纷,不告不理,且在解决诉讼到官府的纠纷时也依契约与情理结案。民众一般采用调解解决纠纷,即使诉讼到官府也是为调解争取更有利于自己的筹码。第三方则是为了维护自己的权威以及文斗乡间社会的和谐。这些因素共同构建了清代黔东南纠纷解决的真实图景。 Because of the prosperity of woods business, continuous economic development and the increase of various disputes among the people, the verbal struggle of Qing Dynasty deviated unique process of disputes settlemen. The htigation documents of verbal struggle for studying resources indicated that there are different ways in the dispute settlement process. There are three kinds of disputes settlement, the gods referee, the official proceedings, third - party mediatiom. Different parties had different psychology in the process of disputes settlement. The government generally took itself as the third party and did not actively meddle in disputes among the people ; it did not hear a case where there was not anyone to commence a legal action and the settlement of the disputes litigated to the government was concluded according to contracts and reasons. The people generally settled their disputes through reconciliation, even when they litigated to the government they just wanted to get counters beneficial to themselves for disputes settlement. These factors work together to build the real picture of dispute resolution southeaster QIAN District in Qing Dynasty.
出处 《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第1期18-23,共6页 Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
基金 校级重点科研项目"清代贵州苗族契约文书研究"(06-XZ-ZD-06)成果之一
关键词 清代 黔东南 纠纷解决 词状 契约 Qing dynasty southeaster QIAN district, disputes the litigation documents
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1[德]马克斯·韦伯.儒教与道教[M].洪天富,译.江苏人民出版社,1993.
  • 2王宗勋.文斗兴衰史略[A].贵州档案史料[C].2002(1).
  • 3[日]滋贺秀三.中国法文化的考察--以诉讼的形态为素材[A].引自王亚新,梁治平.明清时期的民事审判与民间契约[C].北京:法律出版社,1998.14.
  • 4[日]滋贺秀三.清代诉讼制度之民事法源的概括性考察--情、理、法[A].明清时期的民事审判与民间契约[C].王亚新,梁治平等,译.法律出版社,1998.
  • 5[美]黄宗智.清代的法律、社会与文化:民法的实践与表达[M].上海书店出版社,2007.
  • 6[日]寺田浩明.权利与冤抑——清代听讼和民众的民事法秩序[A].滋贺秀三,等著.明清时期的民事审判与民间契约[C].王亚新,梁治平,编.北京:法律出版社,1998.
  • 7[日]高见泽磨.现代中国的纠纷与法[M].何勤华等,译.法律出版社,2003.
  • 8曾宪义,马小红.中国传统法的结构与基本概念辨正——兼论古代礼与法的关系[J].中国社会科学,2003(5):61-73. 被引量:63
  • 9张伟仁.中国传统的司法和法学[J].现代法学,2006,28(5):59-67. 被引量:89
  • 10夫马进.《明清时期的讼师与诉讼制度》,载滋贺秀三.《明清时期的民事审判与民间契约》,王亚新译,法律出版社,1998年版.

二级参考文献36

  • 1谭维四.江陵雨台山21号楚墓律管浅论[J].文物,1988(5):39-42. 被引量:14
  • 2芮国耀.余杭瑶山良渚文化祭坛遗址发掘简报[J].文物,1988(1):32-51. 被引量:124
  • 3.荀子·王制[M].,..
  • 4.荀子·君道[M].,..
  • 5张伟仁.清代的法学教育[A].贺卫方 编.中国法律教育之路[C].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1997..
  • 6G.W.Keeton,The Development of Extraterritoriality in China(New York,Howard Fertig,1969).
  • 7John H.Baker,English Legal History (Butterworths 2001).
  • 8Thomas G Hansford,James F.Spriggs,The Politics of Precedent on the US Supreme Court (Princeton University Press 2006).
  • 9Robert F.Nagel,"Bowing to Precedent",(The Weekly Standard 011:29,2006).
  • 10Nicola Gennaioli,Andrei Shleifer,"The Evolution of Precedent" (NBER Working paper 11265,April 2005).

同被引文献110

引证文献10

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部