关于屠本《十六国春秋》真伪的若干问题

Some Problems about the Authenticity of Histories of Sixteen Kingdoms by TU Jie-sun

屠本《十六国春秋》是依据残本、大量搜集相关史料而成的辑补本,不是杜撰的伪书。判断崔书是否亡佚有三个重要的标准,一是历代书目是否载录,二是历代著作征引情况,三是屠本与其他著述内容异同比较中找出证明残本存在的根据。崔鸿《十六国春秋》并未亡于北宋,直至明代中期仍然没有亡佚,现可找出其流传的基本线索,屠氏正是利用此残本辑补成书的。残本可能亡佚于明末清初。就屠本内容分析,其中部分内容未见其他典籍保存,这是残本保存至明中期,并是屠氏使用残本辑补的明证。

Histories of Sixteen Kingdoms by TU Jie-sun is an extended edition being formed according to incomplete version and by collecting lots of relative historical facts but not a fake book. There are three important standards in judging whether Sixteen Kingdoms by CUI Hong is lost or not. The first is whether it is recorded or not by various historical documents .The second is whether it is cited or not by ancient books many times. The third is finding the evidence to show the incomplete version exists by comparing and contrasting the edition by TU Jie-sun with other ancient books. Edition by CUI Hong does not disappear in Northern Song Dynasty and still could be seen until mid-Ming Dynasty. Now basic clues of its popularity can be found. TU Jie-sun collects scattered historical facts of incomplete version which probably disappears at the turn of Ming and Qing Dynasty and this book comes into being. Analyzing its content of edition by TU Jie-sun, we can see some of the content is not found in other ancient books. This is obvious evidence about the incomplete version being kept until mid-Ming Dynasty and TU Jie-sun＇s collecting scattered historical facts of the incomplete version.