期刊文献+

管道沟槽缺陷破裂强度评估方法研究

Study of Burst Strength Assessment Method of the Gouge Defect on Pipeline
下载PDF
导出
摘要 管道在安装施工及运行中不可避免地会出现机械损伤,机械损伤破裂是管道的主要失效形式之一,沟槽缺陷是管道机械损伤的主要形式。国际上普遍采用NG-18公式评估管道沟槽缺陷。将各种形式的NG-18公式计算结果与试验结果进行比较,得出流变应力是影响NG-18公式预测失效应力的主要因素。采用修正后的ASME B31G标准中的Folias因子与取均值的流动应力的组合最接近实际情况,是一种比较理想的评估方法。 In the pipeline's construction phase and long term operation time, there will be inevitable mechanical damage in the pipeline. The burst of mechanical damage in the pipeline is the main form of pipeline failure. Gouge is the main form of mechanical damage. Commonly use NG-18 formula for assessment of pipe gouge defects in international. Comparing various forms of NG-18 formula with the experimental results, it was educed that the flow stress was a main factor of affecting the failure stress that NG-18 formula predict, and the combination of the Folias factor in the revised ASME B31G standard and the mean flow stress was proximal to the actual situation, so it is a more ideal combination.
出处 《石油矿场机械》 2010年第1期12-16,共5页 Oil Field Equipment
基金 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20060615003) 中国石油科技风险创新研究项目(050511-5-2)
关键词 管道 沟槽 破裂强度 流变应力 Folias因子 pipeline gouge burst strength flow stress Folias factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Rosenfeld, Michael J. Here are factors that govern evaluation of mechanical damage to pipelines[J]. Oil and Gas Journal, 2002, 100(37) :64-69.
  • 2付永善,吴镭,李臻.X70管线钢的硫化氢应力腐蚀损伤研究[J].石油矿场机械,2008,37(1):56-61. 被引量:6
  • 3王艳红,付路长,王旱祥.注水管柱可靠性分析与寿命评估[J].石油矿场机械,2008,37(6):75-77. 被引量:8
  • 4Kiefner J E, Maxey W A, Eiber R J, et al. ASTM STP 536,The Failure Stress Levels of Flaws in Pressudsed Cylinders [S]. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1973 : 461-481.
  • 5郑洪龙,吕英民,杨伟.腐蚀管道修正B31G评定方法研究[J].压力容器,2004,21(4):17-19. 被引量:9
  • 6Hopkins P, Corbin P. A Study of External Damage of Pipelines [C]//Calgary, Alberta, Canada: NG-18/ EPR(; Seventh Joint Biennial Technical Meeting on Line Pipe Research, 1988:5.
  • 7Miller A G. Review of Limit Loads of Structures Containing Defects[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 1988 : 32.
  • 8Roovers P, Bood R, Galli M, et al. EPRG Methods for Assessing the Tolerance and Resistance of Pipelines to External Damage[C]// Denys R, Elsevier Science Ed. Pipeline Technology: Volume Ⅱ. Brugge, Belgium. Proceedings of the Third International Pipeline Technology Conference, 2000 : 405-425.

二级参考文献20

  • 1王有明,孙国雄,汤崇熙.材料损伤断裂的分形模型[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),1994,24(4):26-31. 被引量:3
  • 2熊晓航,辛绍杰,苏恩衡.对注水井管柱失效的研究[J].辽宁工学院学报,1996,16(4):31-33. 被引量:3
  • 3李臻,刘国栋.H_2S应力腐蚀对16MnR钢冲击韧性的影响研究[J].压力容器,2007,24(3):12-14. 被引量:4
  • 4铁摩辛柯 汪一麟译.材料力学(高等理论及问题)[M].北京:科学出版社,1979.24-38.
  • 5GB/T229-1994.金属夏比缺口冲击试验方法[S].[S].,..
  • 6J. F. Kiefner, P. H. Vieth. New Method Corrects Criterion for Evaluating Corroded Pipe[J]. Oil and Gas Journal, 1990,(6):56-59.
  • 7J. F. Kiefner. Corroded Pipe: Strength and Repair Methods,Symposium on Line Pipe Resarch[M]. Houston, Texas,Nov,320-22, 1974.
  • 8D. R. B. Mok, R.J. Pick, A. G. G.lover. Behavior If Line Pipe with Long External Corrosion [M]. Materials Performance . 1990 May:75-79.
  • 9K. E. W. Coulson, R. G. Worthingham . Standard Damage Assessment Approach is Overly Conservative[J]. Oil and Gas Journal, 1990,(9):54-59.
  • 10T.J. O'Grade, D. T. Hisey. J. F. Kiefner. Method for Evaluating Corroded Pipe Addresses Variety of Patterns[J]. Oil and Gas Journal, 1992, (12):77-82.

共引文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部