期刊文献+

逻辑经验主义死亡了吗 被引量:2

Has Logical Empiricism Dead
下载PDF
导出
摘要 波普宣称他杀死了逻辑经验主义。但逻辑经验主义实际上既没有被波普杀死,也没有死亡。对逻辑经验主义的最大挑战是历史主义的科学哲学及其后来的发展。逻辑经验主义的证实原则对于科学研究仍然有效,他的分析方法仍然是哲学分析的基本方法。科学哲学研究仍然沿用逻辑经验主义建立的概念系统,当代科学哲学所阐释的仍然是对逻辑经验主义提出的基本问题的进一步回答。 Karl Popper claims that he has killed logical empiricism,but in fact,logical empiricism is not killed by him if it was dead. Actually it is still alive. The most serious challenge to logical empiricism is from historicism and its later development in scientific philosophy. The principle of verifiability formulated by logical empiricists does still work in guiding science. The methods of logical analysis remain basic in philosophizing. The set of concepts which has shaped the philosophy of science as a discipline continues to be dominant in current studies in the philosophy of science. And its later developments in scientific philosophy are further attempts to answer the questions raised by logical empiricists.
作者 朱志方
出处 《学术研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第1期1-6,24,共7页 Academic Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1John Passmore. I,ogical Positivism [A] . Encyclopedia of Philosophy [C] . ed. by Paul Edwards, vol. V.
  • 2Karl Popper. Who Killed Logical Positivism [A] . Unended Quest: An Intellectual Autobiography [C] . La Salle, Illinois: Open Court, 1974, 1982.
  • 3Karl Popper. Objective Knowledge |M] . Oxforde: The Clarendon Press, 1972.
  • 4Moriz Schlick. Meaning and Verification [A] . Reading in Philosophical Analysis [C] . ed. by Herbert Feigl and Wilfrid Sellars. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc. 1949.
  • 5Rudolf Carnap. The Elimination of metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language [A]. Logical Positivism [C] . ed. by A. J. Ayer, Westpoint, CT.: Greenwood, 1978.
  • 6Mark S.Peacock. The Conceptual Construction of Altruism: Ernst Fehr's Experimental Approach to Human Conduct [J] . Philosophy of the Social Sciences, NO.1, 2007, (37).
  • 7Alfred R. Mele. Recent Work on Free Will and Science [J] . American Philosophical Quarterly, NO.2, 2008, (45).
  • 8Martin Heidegger. What is Metaphysics [A] . Martin Heidegger: Basic Writings [C]. ed. by D. F. Krell. New York: Harper & Row, 1977.
  • 9Barnes, B. and Bloor, D.. Relativism, Rationalism, and the Sociology of Knowledge [A] . M. Hollis and S. Lukes (ed.). Rationality and Relativism [C]. MITPress, 1982.
  • 10R. Giere. Explaining Science [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部