期刊文献+

钢框架结构直接基于位移抗震性能设计的非迭代法 被引量:2

Direct displacement-based seismic performance design without iteration for steel frame structures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为使直接基于位移的抗震性能设计方法更加简便准确,本文采用一种直接基于位移的非迭代抗震设计方法对钢框架结构进行设计。该方法首先考虑结构的非弹性反应确定等效弹性反应谱和弹塑性反应谱,并建立了使用Newmark-Hall变形折减系数的能力谱的明确表达式。采用能力-需求图方法,确定了结构需要的目标位移与延性、谱位移和谱加速度之间关系的明确表示式,得到结构的刚度和设计基底剪力,进而确定构件截面,完成结构设计。对五层两跨平面钢框架结构进行了直接基于位移的抗震性能设计,设计过程简便,无需迭代程序,不需画出反应谱,通过时程分析验证了设计结果的精确性。本文研究表明:直接基于位移的非迭代抗震设计方法是一种简便、高效、精确的抗震性能设计方法。 Direct displacement-based seismic design without iteration is a more simple and rational approach to dis- placement-based seismic design, which was used to design steel frame structures. In this method, the equivalent elastic and elastic-plastic response spectra are ensured considering of structural inelasticity, the ~explicit expression of response spectra including Newmark-Hall deformation reduction factors is achieved. According to the capacity- demand diagram method, the relationship formula among structural demand objective displacement and ductility, spectrum displacement, spectrum acceleration are derived, then base shears of structures are confirmed according to structural stiffness and strength, the structural component sections are designed. 5 floors and 2 strides plane steel frames are designed with direct displacement-based seismic design method without iteration, the process of ,which is simple, response spectra diagram isn' t necessary. The design results are .proved reasonable and exact with time- history analysis. So the direct displacement-based seismic design without iteration .is a simple, effective and accu- rate performance-based seismic design method.
出处 《地震工程与工程振动》 CSCD 北大核心 2010年第1期29-35,共7页 Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics
基金 国家自然科学基金重大研究计划项目(90715021) 国家自然科学基金项目(50678057) 地震行业科研专项基金项目(200808073) 中国博士后科学基金资助项目(20080440891) 哈尔滨工业大学科研创新基金资助(HIT.NSRIF.2009)
关键词 直接基于位移的抗震设计 非迭代 钢框架 反应谱 direct displacement-based seismic design no iteration steel frame response spectra
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1郭磊,李建中,范立础.直接基于位移的结构抗震设计理论研究进展[J].世界地震工程,2005,21(4):157-164. 被引量:16
  • 2Chopra A K, Goel R K. Evaluation NSP to estimate seismic deformation: SDF Systems [ J ]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2000, 126 (4) : 482 - 490.
  • 3马宏旺.一种直接基于位移的抗震设计方法[J].地震工程与工程振动,2007,27(2):45-50. 被引量:8
  • 4Chopra A K, Goel R K. Direct displacement - based design : use of inelastic design spectra versus elastic design spectra [ J ]. Earthquake Spectra, 2001, 17(1) : 47 -65.
  • 5Lin Yuyuan, Chang Kuochun. A non-iterative direct displacement - based design procedure for SDOF steel columns: Using substitute structure [J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanics Series A, 2003, 19(3) : 357 -364.
  • 6Lin Y Y, Chang K C. On the non-iterative procedure of direct displacement-based seismic design for portal R. C. bridges : Using inelastic design spectrum [J]. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 2005, 28(2) : 293 -303.
  • 7Xue Qiang. A direct displacement-based seismic seismic design procedure of inelastic structures [ J ]. Engineering Structures, 2001,23 ( 11 ) : 1453 - 1460.
  • 8Xue Qiang. A direct displacement-based seismic design procedure to fulfill multiple performance objectives [ J]. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 2002, 25 (4) :469 - 472.
  • 9Xue Qiang, Chen Cheng chung. Performance - based seismic design of structures: a direct displacement - based approach [ J ]. Engineering Structures, 2003, 25(14):1803 - 1813.
  • 10Newmark N M, Hall W J. Earthquake spectra and design [ M]. Berkeley, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, 1982,.

二级参考文献56

  • 1.GB 50011-2001,建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001.111-118.
  • 2Fajfar P. Equivalent ductility factors taking into account low-cycle fatigue[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1992,21 (10):837-848.
  • 3Hose Y D and Seible F. Performance evaluation database for concrete bridge componets and systems under simulated seismic loads[R]. Report No. PEER-1999/11, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 1999.
  • 4Veletsos A S and Newmark N M. Effect of inelastic behavior on the response of simple systems to earthquake motions[A], Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Earthquake Engineering[C], 1960,2,895-912.
  • 5Miranda E. Inelastic displacement ratio for structures on firm sites[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 2000,126(10):1150-1159.
  • 6Chopra A K and Goel R K. Capacity-demand-diagram methods for estimating seismic deformation of inelastic structures: SDF systems[R]. Report No. PEER-1999/02, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 1999.
  • 7Miranda E. Estimation of Inelastic deformation demands of SDOF systems[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 2001,127(9): 1005-1012.
  • 8Freeman S A, Nicoletti J P and Tyrell J V. Evaluations of existing buildings for seismic risk-A case study of Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton, Washington[A]. Proceedings of 1st U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering[C], 1975, 113-122.
  • 9ATC -40, Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings[R]. Applied Technology Council, Red Wood City, California, 1996.
  • 10FEMA -273, NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings[S]. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D. C. ,1997.

共引文献21

同被引文献37

引证文献2

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部