摘要
以三玄、《坛经》与《几何学起源》为例,进行象思维与概念思维在对待语言态度上的比较,发现两种态度的共同之处:把语言当作工具,合理规避语言的"存在"性。通过对此共同态度的分析,意图揭示出深层的蕴涵,即中西思维不仅有相通之处,而且是一种奠基与被奠基的关系,两者的融通或可为研究语言与人的关系提供新的视角。
Taking Sanxuan ("三玄"), Tanjing and The Origin of Geometry as the case, this paper makes a comparison between Xiang thinking and concept thinking on their respective attitudes towards language before finding out the common point of the two attitudes, that is, treating language as a tool and reasonably evading its trait of "Being". By means of analyzing the com- mon attitude, this paper aims to reveal the in-depth connotation, to wit, Chinese thinking has something in common with Western thinking, and the two thinking modes are in the relationship of founding and being founded. In addition, it is the presumption of this paper that the fusion of the two thinking modes might offer a new perspective for the study of the relationship between language and man.
出处
《杭州师范大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第6期15-20,共6页
Journal of Hangzhou Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
关键词
象思维
概念思维
语言态度
工具
合理规避
Xiang thinking
concept thinking
attitude towards language
tool
reasonable evasion