期刊文献+

Fenton对渗滤液中DOM及其组分的去除特性研究 被引量:9

STUDY ON THE DOM AND FRACTIONS CHARACTERISTIC OF LANDFILL LEACHAT BY THE FENTON REAGENT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 考察了Fenton反应对渗滤液中DOM的处理效果,分析了Fenton反应前后DOM各组成成分及其表观分子量的变化。研究表明,Fenton对DOM的去除效果较好,其COD和DOC的去除率均在50%以上,UV254的去除率达到84.5%。处理前,HA和FA为DOM主要组成部分,其COD、DOC及UV254总和质量分数分别为DOM总量的77.5%、76.2%和86.7%,处理后渗滤液中DOM以FA和Hyl为主,两者的COD、DOC及UV254总和质量分数分别为DOM总量的97.6%、95.2%和95.1%。Fenton反应前,HA中以>4k的有机物为主,FA和Hyl则以<4k的有机物为主,反应后,3组分中均以<4k的有机物为主要组成部分,并且,Fenton对渗滤液中DOM3组分各指标的去除能力总体呈现HA>FA>Hyl的趋势。 This changes of DOM in landfill leachate by Fenton reaction, and then analyzed the changes ofhumic acid (HA), fulic acid (FA) and hydrophilic (Hyl) fractions and their molecular weight (MW) in the landfill leachate were analyzed. The results showed that COD and DOC removal rate could exceed 50%, and UV254 removal rate was about 84.5%. Before Fenton process, HA and FA fractions was the main parts in DOM, and COD, DOC and UV254 of the two parts were 77.5%, 76.2% and 86.7% in total DOM, respectively. But after Fenton, the main parts was FA and Hyl fractions, and COD, DOC and UV254 of the two parts were 97.6%,95.2% and 95.1% in total DOM, respectively. Before Fenton reaction, the organic matters with MW〉4 k was main part of HA, and the organic matters with MW 〈4 k was the main part of FA and Hyl. After Fenton reaction, all the three fractions were mainly composed of organic matters with MW〈4 k. And in all the removal efficiency for the HA, FA and Hyl followed HA〉FA〉Hyl.
出处 《水处理技术》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第2期64-67,共4页 Technology of Water Treatment
基金 教育部科学研究重大项目"城市污水处理厂高效稳定运行共性关键支撑技术研究"(308020)
关键词 垃圾渗滤液 FENTON 表观分子质量 DOM组分 landfill leachate, fenton molecular weight (MW) DOM fractions
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献24

  • 1朱南文,闵航,陈美慈,赵宇华.TTC─脱氢酶测定方法的探讨[J].中国沼气,1996,14(2):3-5. 被引量:95
  • 2EdzwaLd J K. Coagulation concepts for removal of TOC[A]. In Proc AWWA WQTC Conf[C], San Francisco, LA (Nov. 12--16),1994.
  • 3Frimmel F H. Characterization of natural organic matter as major constituents in aquatic systems[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 1998, 35, 201--216.
  • 4LeChevallier M W, Babock T M, Lee R G. Examination and characterization of distribution system biofilm[J]. Appl. Environ. Microbial. 1987, 53, 2714--2724.
  • 5Vik E A, Eikebrokk B. In coagulation process for removal of humic substances from drinking water[M], Washington D C. American Chemical Society, 1989, 385--408.
  • 6Joret J C, Levi Y. Methode rapide d'evaluation du carbone eliminable des eaux par voie biologique[J]. Trib Cebedeau, 1986, 39:3--9.
  • 7Franz-Josef G. Structural investigation of isolated aquatic fulic and humic acids in seepage water of waste deposits by PyrolysisGas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry. Wat. Res., 1997,(7): 1609~1618
  • 8enfenati E. Comparative studies of the leachate of an industrial landfill by Gas chromatography-Mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography-nuclear magnetic resonance and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1999,83:1243~1256
  • 9Jean-Michel Laine. Ultra filtration of lake water: Effect of pretreatment on the portioning of organics, THMFP and flux. JourAWWA, 1990, 82(12):82~87
  • 10Kristina Linde. Treatment of three types of landfill leachate with reverse osmosis. Desalination, 1995, 101:21~30

共引文献67

同被引文献105

引证文献9

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部