摘要
近年来,政治行为已经成为会计准则制定过程中的一个重要议题。以美国和欧盟为例,从博弈论角度对会计准则制定过程中的政治过程进行深入分析,发现美国和欧盟的会计准则制定主体——FASB和IASB遵循一个极为相似的程序,但它们却被植入了截然不同的政治环境中。对于一个相似的新会计准则,即使两个会计准则制定主体有着极为相似的偏好,其结果也将迥然不同。
In recent years accounting researchers have identified political behavior as a significant issue for accounting standard setting. This paper presents a simple game-theoretic analysis of the political process. It shows that EU and USA set accounting standard in terms of a similar procedure. However, because of different political contexts, the setting procedure produces different outcomes.
出处
《上海商学院学报》
2010年第1期36-39,55,共5页
Business Economic Review
关键词
会计准则
政治游说
监管
反对性参与者
accounting standards, political lobbying, regulation, veto players