期刊文献+

经直肠多普勒超声定量参数对前列腺结节的诊断价值 被引量:1

The value of quantitative paraneter measured by transrectal Doppler ultrasonograpy in diagnosis of prostate nodules
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价经直肠多普勒超声定量参数诊断前列腺结节良、恶性的临床应用价值。方法应用彩色多普勒超声(CDUS)和能量多普勒超声(PDUS)及彩色血流分析软件,记录52例患者共67个前列腺结节的峰值血流指数(PVI),并比较不同多普勒超声条件下前列腺良、恶性结节组间PVI的差异。并对两种方法测得的PVI行受试者工作特征(ROC)分析。结果CDUS测得32个前列腺恶性结节PVI显著高于35个前列腺良性结节[(0.38±0.16)vs.(0.24±0.19)(P<0.05)。PDUS测得前列腺恶性结节的PVI显著高于良性结节[(0.55±0.18)vs.(0.32±0.21)(P<0.05)。PDUS测得的PVI对前列腺癌的血流定量评估更具优越性。结论多普勒定量参数PVI是鉴别前列腺肿瘤良恶性的有效指标。 Objective To investigate the clinical value of transrectal color Doppler ultrasonography(CDUS)for differenciating the benign from the malignant prostate nodules.MethodsCDUS,power Doppler ultrasonography(PDUS)and the analytic software of color flow were used to record and analyze quantitatively the peak vascularization index(PVI)in 52 cases(67 prostate nodules).Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)analysis was performed.Results Measured by CDUS,PVI of 32 malignant prostate nodules was significantly higher than that of 35 benign nodules [(0.38±0.16)vs.(0.24±0.19)](P〈0.05).So did the PVI measured by PDUS [(0.55±0.18)vs.(0.32±0.21)](P〈0.05).As a quantitative parameter to discriminate prostate cancer,PVI measured by PDUS was more effective than that measured by CDUS.Conclusion PVI measured by Doppler ultrasonography is an effective quantitative parameter for discriminating the malignant prostate nodules from the benign nodules.
出处 《江苏医药》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第1期8-10,共3页 Jiangsu Medical Journal
基金 苏州市社会发展指导计划(SZD0878)
关键词 经直肠超声 彩色/能量多普勒 前列腺结节 Transrectal ultrasonography Color/power Doppler Prostate nodule
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Rifkin MD, Sudakoff GS, Alexander AA. Prostate: techniques, results and potential applications of color Doppler US scanning[J]. Radiology,1993,186(2):509-513.
  • 2Ismail M, Petersen RO, Alexander AA, et al. Color Doppler imaging in predicting the biologic behavior of prostate cancer: correlation with disease-free survival[J]. Urology, 1997,50 (6):906-912.
  • 3Halpern EJ,Ramey JR,Strup SE,et al. Detection of prostate carcinoma with contrast- enhanced sonography using intermittent harmonic imaging [J].Cancer, 2005, 104 ( 11 ) : 2373- 2383.
  • 4Tang J, Yang JC, Li YM, et al. Peripheral zone hypoechoic lesions of the prostate: evaluation with contrast-enhanced gray scale transrectal ultrasonography [J].J Ultrasound Med,2007,26 (12) : 1671-1679.
  • 5张迎春,方军初,陈明,单玉喜,沈钧康.经直肠超声与直肠线圈磁共振检查对前列腺癌的诊断价值[J].江苏医药,2008,34(5):466-467. 被引量:2
  • 6Karaman CZ, Unsal A, Akdilli A, et al. The value of contrast enhanced power Doppler ultrasonography in differentiating hypoehoic lesions in the peripheral zone of prostate[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2005 ; 54 ( 1 ) :148-155.
  • 7Kamoi K, Okihara K, Ochiai A, et al. The utility of transrectal real-tlme elastography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol,2008,34(7):1025-1032.
  • 8Okihara K, Kojima M, Nakanouchi T, et al. Transrectal power Doppler imaging in the detection of prostate cancer [J]. BJU Int,2000,85(9) : 1053-1057.
  • 9Huang ST, Hsieh ML. Evaluation of resistance index in patients with prostate cancer[J]. Anticancer Res, 2008, 28 (4A) : 1985-1988.
  • 10陈亚青,周永昌,黄慕民,唐天雪,张惠箴,陈洁晴.彩色直方图估测前列腺血流的价值[J].中国超声医学杂志,2001,17(5):328-330. 被引量:33

二级参考文献10

  • 1顾方六.前列腺增生和前列腺癌在中国发病情况的初步探讨[J].中华外科杂志,1993,31(6):323-326. 被引量:70
  • 2佟艳军,王霄英,李飞宇,蒋学祥.MR对前列腺癌的定性诊断价值分析[J].中国医学影像技术,2006,22(7):1061-1063. 被引量:10
  • 3仇学文,徐卓群,徐汇义,胡强,王志荣,阮钧,诸明,徐则乔,张坚,徐进宇,胡礼炳.前列腺癌根治术后复发六例[J].江苏医药,2007,33(3):320-321. 被引量:2
  • 4周永昌.超声引导下自动枪前列腺穿刺活检的几点体会--附80例分析[J].中国超声医学杂志,1998,14(4):61-61.
  • 5Cho Jeongyeon,Eur Urol,2000年,37卷,433页
  • 6周永昌,中国超声医学杂志,1998年,14卷,4期,61页
  • 7Tanigawa N,Caide LU,Mitsui T.Quantitation of sinusoidlike vessels in hepatocellar carcinoma:its clinical and prognostic significance[J].Hepatology,1997,26:1216-1223.
  • 8周永昌,郭万学,主编.超声医学[M].第4版.北京:科学技术文献出版社,2004:798-810.
  • 9Drudi FM, Giovagnorio F, Carbone A, et al. Transreetal eolour Doppler contrast sonography in the diagnosis of local recurrence after radieal prostateetomg-eomparison with MRI[J]. Ultrasehall Med, 2006,27(2) : 146-151.
  • 10Prando A, Kurhanewiz J, Borges AP, et al. Prostatic biopsy directed with endorectal MR spectroscopic imaging findings in patients with elevated prostate specific antigen levels and prior negative biopsy fingings: early experience[J]. Radiology, 2005, 236(3) : 903-910.

共引文献35

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部