期刊文献+

鸡源和鹅源新城疫病毒在宿主细胞上的蚀斑形成特性及形态发生学比较 被引量:7

Comparison of Plaque-Forming Characteristics and Morphogenetic Changes of Newcastle Disease Virus Isolated from Chickens and Geese on Host Cells
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过蚀斑形成试验比较鸡源(F48E9株)和鹅源(NA-1株)新城疫病毒在不同细胞的蚀斑形成能力,结果显示F48E9、NA-1两种病毒在Vero细胞、鸡胚成纤维细胞(CEF)和鹅胚成纤维细胞(GEF)上蚀斑形成能力存在明显的差异,在GEF上NA-1株的蚀斑形成能力强于F48E9株,而在CEF上弱于F48E9株,在Vero细胞上NA-1株的蚀斑形成能力稍强于F48E9株,表明病毒蚀斑形成特性与宿主种属特性一致。通过电镜观察两株病毒以相同感染量感染Vero细胞后的病毒形态发生过程。NA-1株和F48E9株病毒在Vero细胞中不同时段的形态发生的进程上存在区别,无论从出芽时间还是出芽后病毒囊膜的完整性上,NA-1株均优于F48E9株,提示NA-1株病毒对宿主环境的适应力较强。 The plaque-forming characteristics of Newcastle disease viruses of chickens and geese source were compared on various cells. The result showed that there were obvious differences of plaque formation between F48E9 and NA-1 on Vero cells, chicken embryo fibroblast cells (CEF) and goose embryo fibroblast cells (GEF) . The plaque-forming ability of NA-1 was higher than F48E9 on GEF, but lower than F48E9 on CEF. On Vero ceils, the plaque-forming ability of NA-1 was slightly stronger than F48E9. It demonstrated that the plaque-forming characteristics were consistent with host tropism of virus. The morphogenesis of F48E9 and NA-1 on Vero cells was observed with transmission electron microscope. There were different replication processes between F48E9 and NA-1 on cells at different stages. NA-1 had stronger adaptability to host than F48E9 according to budding processes and envelope integrity.
出处 《病毒学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第1期58-64,共7页 Chinese Journal of Virology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30771606)
关键词 新城疫病毒 形态发生 病毒蚀斑 透射电子显微镜 Newcastle disease morphogenesis virus plaque transmission electron microscope
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献67

  • 1左玉柱,乔木,王学理,向华,黄海楠,常爽,丁壮.鹅源副粘病毒NA-1株F蛋白基因的克隆及其载体的构建[J].中国兽医学报,2004,24(5):436-438. 被引量:15
  • 2辛朝安,任涛,罗开健,张洁,杨佩琼.疑似鹅副粘病毒感染诊断初报[J].养禽与禽病防治,1997(1):5-5. 被引量:87
  • 3[1]Abemes G, Kida h, Yanagawa. Antigenic mapping and functional analysis of the F protein of Newcastle disease virus using monoclonal antibodies[J]. Arch. Virol,90:97 ~ 110.
  • 4[2]Alexander, D. Diseases of Poultry[M]. 10th ed. (Calnek, B. W. ed).Iowa state University Press, Ames, lowa. 1997, pp 541 ~ 579.
  • 5[3]Alexander D.J. Newcastle disease and other avian paramyxoviruses [J]. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz.,2002,19: 443~462.
  • 6[4]Alexander D J, Allan,W. H. Newcastle disease virus pathotypes. Avian Pathol[J]. 1974,3:269 ~ 268.
  • 7[5]Alexander D J., Campbell G. Manvell R J., et al. Characterization of an antigenically unusual virus responsible for two outbreaks of Newcastle disease in the Republic of Ireland in 1990[J]. Vet. Rec.1992,130: 65~68.
  • 8[6]Alexander D J, Parsons G. Protection of chickens against challenge with the variant virus responsible for Newcastle disease in 1984 by conventional vaccination. Vet. Rec. ,1986,118: 176~177.
  • 9[7]Allan W H, Lancaster J D,Toth B.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation[ A]. Newcastle disease vaccines[ M ]. pp: 74 ~79.
  • 10[8]Colllins M S, Bashiruddin, J B, Alexander D J.Deduced amino acid soquenecs at the fusion protein cleavage site of Newcastle disease viruses showing variation in antigenicity and pathogenicity. Arch. Virol., 1993,128:363 ~ 370.

共引文献222

同被引文献92

引证文献7

二级引证文献72

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部