期刊文献+

经尿道反馈式微波治疗高危BPH 被引量:2

Effect of transurethral feedback microwave thermotherapy in high risk patients with benign prostate hyperplasia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价经尿道反馈式微波治疗高危BPH患者的疗效及安全性。方法高危BPH患者66例,其中年龄≥80岁者32例,合并高血压31例,糖尿病5例,心功能不全8例,慢性阻塞性肺病10例,脑梗死11例,骨折、截肢或关节僵硬不能截石位3例,凝血功能异常4例,胰腺炎2例,心律失常6例以及恶性肿瘤3例。尿道局部麻醉下采用个体化功率行经尿道反馈式微波治疗。使15%~30%前列腺组织凝固性坏死。对前列腺和周围组织温度实时监测并反馈,确保周围组织的安全。比较治疗前和治疗后3个月B超检查和最大尿流率检查以及国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)和生活质量评分(QOL)结果。结果66例患者均能耐受治疗,除轻微出血、感染及一过性尿失禁外,无明显外科并发症。前列腺体积由62.2ml减少至44.5ml,IPSS评分由治疗前(23.4±9.5)分降至(11.7±7.9)分,QOI,由(4.5±1.2)分减少至(2.4±1.4)分,最大尿流率由(4.2±3.9)ml/s升高至(11.2±4.4)ml/s,治疗前后差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论经尿道反馈式微波治疗高危BPH患者尤其是不能耐受麻醉的患者安全有效。并可用于门诊治疗。 Objective To evaluate the effect of transurethral feedback microwave tbermotherapy with the ProstaLund CoreTherm Device(PLFT) in high risk patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Methods Sixty-six high risk patients diagnosed with BPH, including aged ≥80 in 32 pa tients, hypertension in 31 patients, diabetes in 5 patients, heart failure in 8 patients, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 8 patients, cerebral infarction in 11 patients, fracture, amputation or joint stiffness unsuitable for lithotomy position in 3 patients, abnormal blood coagulation in 4 patients, pan creatitis in 2 patients, cardiac arrhythmia in 6 patients and malignant tumor in 3 patients, were treated with PLFT using individual power at urethral local anesthesia, resulting in coagulation necrosis in 15 %--30% of prostate tissue around urethra. Meanwhile, real-time monitoring the temperature of prostate and the tissue around it was used. All patients were evaluated by comparing volume of prostate, maximal urinary flow (Qmax), international prostate symptom score (IPSS) and quality of life questionnaire (QOL) in pre-treatment and three months after respectively. Results All of patients well tolerated PLFT. There was bleeding lightly, infection lightly and temporary incontinence. There was no severe surgical complication. After three months, the volume of prostate reduced from 62.2 ml to 44.5 ml; IPSS decreased from 23.4 to 11.7; QOL decreased from 4.5 to 2.4; Qmax rised from 4.2 ml/s to 11.2 ml/s. All differences reached significance. Conclusion PLFT is one of effective and safe treatments for patients with BPH especial BPH complicating with severe conditions.
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第2期113-115,共3页 Chinese Journal of Urology
关键词 良性前列腺增生 微波 Benign prostate hyperplasia Microwave
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Mattiasson A, Wagrell L, Schelin S, et al. Five-year follow up of feedback microwave thermotherapy versus TURP for clinical BPH:a prospective randomized multicenter study. Urology, 2007, 69:91-96.
  • 2张树平,王玉瑛,崔淑敏,陈保民.微波热疗在肿瘤临床中的应用[J].实用医技杂志,2002,9(12):945-948. 被引量:7
  • 3Vesely S, Muller M, Knutson T, et al. Transurethral micro wave thermotherapy of the prostate evaluation with MRI and analysis of parameters relevant to outcome. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 2008, 42:53-58.
  • 4Brehmer M, Hilliges M, Kinn AC. Denervation of periurethral prostatic tissue by transurethral microwave thermotherapy. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 2000, 34:42- 45.
  • 5Walmsley K, Kaplan SA. Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for benign prostate hyperplasia: separating truth from marketing hype. J Urol, 2004, 172:1249-1255.
  • 6郭应禄.提高局部热疗效果的温度段概念[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2001,22(8):458-459. 被引量:17
  • 7Sehelin S, Geertsen U, Walter S, et al. Feedback microwave thermotherapy versus TURP/prostate enucleation surgery in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and persistent urinary retention: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study. Urology, 2006, 68: 795-799.
  • 8张炽敏,张俊,王剑翔,李嘉,苏俊.水循环冷却式微波天线凝固肝组织的实验研究[J].中国超声医学杂志,2006,22(1):8-10. 被引量:7

二级参考文献6

共引文献28

同被引文献17

  • 1叶林,沈燕丽,侯旭,杨进益,李树伦,姜兴金,姜洪波.前列腺增生经尿道电切术后出血的原因与处理(附55例报告)[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2005,20(1):27-29. 被引量:109
  • 2张祥华,王行环,王刚.中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南.北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:167-204.
  • 3Rassweiler J,Teber D,Kuntz R,et al.Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate(TURP)-incidence,management,and prevention.Eur Urol,2006,(50):969-980.
  • 4Kacker R, Williams SB. Endourologic procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia: review of indications and outcomes. Urol J, 2011, 8: 171-176.
  • 5Kehinde EO, Abul F. Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a preliminary assess- ment of the Prostalund feedback treatment machine. Med Princ Pract, 2005, 14: 272-276.
  • 6Tan AH, Nott L, Hardie WR, et al. Long-term results of micro- wave thermotherapy for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol, 2005, 19: 1191-1195.
  • 7Daehlin L, Frugard J. Transurethral microwave thermotherapy in the management of lower urinary tract symptoms from benign pros- tatic obstruction: follow-up after five years. Scand J Urol Neph- rol, 2000, 34: 304-308.
  • 8Kaye JD, Smith AD, Badlani GH, et al. High-energy transure- thral thermotherapy with CoreTherm approaches transurethral prostate resection in outcome efficacy: a meta-analysis. J Endou- rol, 2008, 22: 713-718.
  • 9Vesely S, Muller M, Knutson T, et al. Transurethral microwave thermotherapy of the prostate-evaluation with MRI and analysis of parameters relevant to outcome. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 2008, 42: 53-58.
  • 10Bhowmick P, Coad JE, Bhowmick S, et al. In vitro assessment of the efficacy of thermal therapy in human benign prostatic hy- perplasia. Int J Hyperthermia, 2004, 20: 421-439.

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部