期刊文献+

军人心理承受力量表的信度效度检验 被引量:7

Reliability and validity of the mental resilience scale for military personnel
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研制中国军人心理承受力量表,检验量表的信度和效度。方法随机整群抽取健康男性官兵2611人,分为A组(n=1112)、B组(n=1499)。用自制《军人心理承受力量表》分别对两组进行测试。对A组数据进行探索性因素分析和相关分析;对B组数据进行验证性因素分析。结果经探索性因素分析和相关分析发现,总量表的Cronbach'α系数为0.833,各分量表为0.535~0.880。总量表分半信度系数为0.787,各分量表为0.339~0.611。总量表重测信度系数为0.401,各分量表为0.302~0.668。量表总分与各因子的相关系数为0.445~0.786(P<0.01),各因子之间的相关系数为0.110~0.679(P<0.01)。经验证性因素分析发现,数据与假设的5因子模型(意志力、家庭支持、自信、问题解决和人际交往)拟合程度较高,拟合指标的χ2值为1663.997,近似均方根差为0.054,残差均方根值为0.021,塔克-刘易斯指数、比较拟合指数、增值拟合指数、拟合优度指数分别0.921、0.931、0.931、0.922。结论自行编制的军人心理承受力量表具有良好的信度和效度,可在部队推广使用。 Objective To develop a mental resilience scale for military personnel and examine the reliability and validity of this scale.MethodsA total of 2611 male officers and soldiers chosen by random cluster sampling to outline the mental resilience scale for military personnel,with the subjects divided into group A and group B.In group A (n=1112) exploratory factor analysis and correlation analysis were used,and in group B (n=1499) confirmatory factor analysis was used.ResultsThe results of exploratory factor analysis and correlation analysis indicated that the Cronbach'α coefficient of total scale was 0.833,and that of subscales was 0.535-0.880;split-half reliability coefficient of total scale was 0.787,and that of subscales 0.339-0.611;retest-reliability coefficient of total scale was 0.401,and that of subscales 0.302-0.668.The correlation coefficients of total scale scores and each factor were 0.445-0.786 (P0.01),and the correlation coefficients ranged from 0.110 to 0.679 between the factors (P0.01).According to the results of confirmatory factor analysis,the sample data fitted better to the hypothesized structure of five factors (willpower,family support,self-confidence,problem solving and interpersonal communication),and the indexes of Chi-Square,root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA),root mean square residual (RMR),Tucker-Lewis index (TLI),comparative fit index (CFI),incremental fit index (IFI) and goodness of fit index (GFI) were 1663.997,0.054,0.021,0.921,0.931,0.931 and 0.922,respectively.ConclusionThe mental resilience scale for military personnel has good reliability and validity and can be extensively applied to the militaries.
作者 汤泉 张理义
出处 《解放军医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第2期228-230,共3页 Medical Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army
关键词 心理测定学 军事人员 可重复性 结果 psychometrics military personnel reproducibility of results
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Campbell-Silis L, Forde DR, Stein MB. Demographic and childhood environmental predictors of resilience in a community sample[J]. J Psychiatr Res, 2009, 43(12) : 1007-1012.
  • 2Lamond AJ, Depp CA, Allison M, et al. Measurement and predictors of resilience among community-dwelling older women[J]. J Psychiatr Res, 2008, 43(2) : 148-154.
  • 3Letzring TD, Block J, Funder DC. Ego-control and ego-resiliency: generalization of self report scales based on personality descriptions from acquaintances, clinicians, and the self[J]. J Res Pets, 2005, 39 (4) : 395-422.
  • 4MeVey G, Tweed S, Blackmore E. Healthy Schools-Healthy Kids: a controlled evaluation of a comprehensive universal eating disorder prevention program[J]. Body Image, 2007, 4(2): 115-136.
  • 5郭庆科,王炜丽,陈雪霞,韩丹.验证性因素分析中模型拟合的判断[J].心理学探新,2007,27(4):83-87. 被引量:22
  • 6Seligman ME, Csikszentimihalyi M. Positive psychology. An introduetion[J]. Arn Psychol, 2000, 55(1): 5-14.
  • 7Tim R, Hardy L, Evans L Construct validity of the social support survey in sport[J]. Psychol Sport Exerc, 2007, 8(3): 355-368.

二级参考文献16

  • 1温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷.调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J].心理学报,2005,37(2):268-274. 被引量:3031
  • 2Joreskog K G, Sorbom D. LISREL 8: User' s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software international, 1996.
  • 3Hu L T, Bentler P. Evaluating model fit. In: R. H. Hoyle, Ed. Structural Equation Modeling. Concepts, Issues, and Applications. London: Sage, 1995.76 - 99.
  • 4Bentler P M. EQS structural equations program manual. Eneino, CA: Multivariate Software, 1995.
  • 5Fan X, Thompson B, Wang L. Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, (6) :56 - 83.
  • 6Muthen L K, Muthen B O. Mplus User's Guide. Los Angeles, CA, 2001.
  • 7Bollen K A.Overall fit in covariance structure models:Two types of sample size effects. Psychological Bulletin, 1990, 107: 256-259.
  • 8Marsh H W, Balla J R, McDonald R P. Goodness - of - fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 1988,103(3) :391 - 410.
  • 9McDonald R P, Marsh H W.Choosing a multivariate model: Non - centrality and goodness - of - fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990, 107:247 - 255.
  • 10Marsh H W, Hau K-T. Assessing goodness of fit:Is parsimony always desirable? The Journal of Experimental Education, 64, 1996:364 - 390.

共引文献21

同被引文献49

引证文献7

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部