期刊文献+

应用微阵列比较基因组杂交技术精确诊断不平衡染色体畸变 被引量:6

Application of array-based comparative genomic hybridization in precise diagnosis of unbalanced chromosome aberration
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨微阵列比较基因组杂交技术(array-based comparative genomic hybridization,array—CGH)在诊断不平衡染色体畸变中的应用价值。方法选取4例常规G显带染色体核型分析未能确诊的不平衡染色体畸变病例,按照标准的Affymetrix SNP 6.0微阵列的操作手册进行杂交、洗涤及全基因组扫描,并通过相应的计算机软件分析结果。结果通过array-CGH技术分析,明确了所有4例染色体不平衡畸变的诊断并且进行精确定位,其中对2例患者镜下染色体出现无法确定来源的额外条带进行了自身直接重复的确诊;对2例患者G显带无法识别的缺失合并重复的衍生染色体进行了精确诊断。结论array-CGH技术在DNA水平上对染色体不平衡畸变的诊断具有独特的高分辨率、高敏感性和高特异性,并且能够精确定位,对染色体疾病作出基因型-表型关系的诊断具有重大的应用价值。 Objective To evaluate the method of array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) in identifying unbalanced chromosome aberrations. Methods Four cases that could not be diagnosed by conventional cytogenetic technique were selected to undergo array-CGH analysis. DNA samples were extracted and hybridized with the Affymetrix SNP 6.0 arrays using Human Mapping SNP6.0 assay kit following the manufacturer's standard protocol. The data were analyzed by two professional software packages, GCOS and Genotyping Console. Results By using array-CGH technique, all the four cases were diagnosed precisely through identifying two duplications and two complex derivative chromosomes. Conclusion Array-CGH is an effective method for whole-genome identification of unbalanced chromosomal aberrations with high sensitivity and specificity. It has a great value to investigate the correlations between genotype and phenotype in clinical service, especially in prenatal diagnosis.
出处 《中华医学遗传学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第1期47-51,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics
基金 十一五国家科技支撑计划支撑项目(2006BAI05A05) 广州市医药卫生科技重点项目(2006-ZDi-19) 广州市医药卫生科技项目(2008-YB-090)
关键词 微阵列比较基因组杂交技术 不平衡染色体畸变 基因型-表型关系 array-based comparative genomic hybridization unbalanced chromosome aberration genotype-phenotype relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Tepperberg J, Pettenati MJ, Rao PN,et al. Prenatal diagnosis using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): 2- year multi-center retrospective study and review of the literature. Prenat Diagn, 2001,21:702-704.
  • 2Ward BE, Gersen SL, Carelli MP, et al. Integrated genetics, framingham rapid prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal aneuploidies by fluorescence in situ hybridization: clinical experience with 4500 specimens. Am J Hum Genet, 1993,52:854-865.
  • 3Hulten MADS, Pertl B. Rapid and simple prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome disorders; advantages and disadvantages of the molecular methods FISH and QF PCR. Reproduction, 2003, 126:279- 297.
  • 4Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Sudar D, et al. Comparative genomie hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science, 1992,258 : 818-821.
  • 5Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D,et al. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat Genet, 1998,20:207-211.
  • 6de Ravel TJ, Devriendt K. What's new in karyotyping? the move towards array comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH). Eur J Pediatr, 2007,166:637-643.
  • 7Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, et al. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat Genet, 1998,20:207-211.
  • 8Boghosian--Sell L, Mewar R, Harrison W, et al. Molecular mapping of the Edwards syndrome phenotype to two noncontiguous regions on chromosome 18. Am J Hum Genet, 1994,55:476-483.
  • 9Floridia G, Piantanida M, Minelli A, et al. The same molecular mechanism at the maternal meiosis I produces mono and dicentric 8p duplications. Am J Hum Genet, 1996,58:785-796.
  • 10Die- Smulders CE, Engelen JJ. Inversion duplication of the short arm of chromosome 8: clinical data on seven patients and review of the literature. Am J Med Genet, 1995,59:369-374.

同被引文献75

  • 1凌晨,邓学东,刘一琳,王挺,唐亚奇,陆冰,偶健,李琼.胎儿淋巴水囊瘤超声诊断联合染色体核型分析[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2011,8(4):838-842. 被引量:12
  • 2张月萍,徐建忠,殷民,陈美芳,任德麟.染色体平衡易位携带者妊娠风险及妊娠结局的研究[J].中华妇产科杂志,2006,41(9):592-596. 被引量:37
  • 3Cheung SW,Shaw CA,Yu W,et al.Development and validation of aCGH microarray for clinical cytogenetic diagnosis.Genet Med,2005,7:422-432.
  • 4Bejjani BA,Saleki R,Ballif BC,et al.Use of targeted arraybased CGH for the clinical diagnosis of chromosomal imbalance:is less more? Am J Med Genet A,2005,134:259-267.
  • 5Pinkel D,Segraves R,Sudar D,et al.High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays.Nat Genet,1998,20:207-211.
  • 6Shprintzen RJ,Goldberg RB,Lewin ML,et al.A new syndrome involving cleft palate,cardiac anomalies,typical facies,and learning disabilities,velo-cardio-facial syndrome.Cleft Palate J,1978,15:56-62.
  • 7Perez E,Sullivan KE.Chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (DiGeorge and velocardiofacial syndromes).Curr Opin Pediatr,2002,14:678-683.
  • 8Swillen A,Devriendt K,Legius E,et al.The behavioural phenotype in velo-cardio-facial syndrome (VCFS):frominfancy to adolescence.Genet Couns,1999,10:79-88.
  • 9Bittel DC,Yu S,Newkirk H,et al.Refining the 22q11.2 deletion breakpoints in DiGeorge syndrome by aCGH.Cytogenet Genome Res,2009,124:113-120.
  • 10Bromley B,Lieberman E,Shipp TD,et al. The genetic sonogram:a method of risk assessment for Down syndrome in the second tri-mester[J]. J Ultrasound Med *2002 ,21(10) : 1087-1096.

引证文献6

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部