期刊文献+

金文字体与铜器断代 被引量:22

PALEOGRAPHY AS A CRITERION OF DATING OF WESTERN ZHOU BRONZE VESSELS INSCRIPITIONS
原文传递
导出
摘要 A considerable progress has been made during recent years in the field of elaboration of reliable typological technique of dating of Western Zhou bronze vessels inscriptions.Nevertheless,some problems of methodological nature still exist,causing discrepancies in opinions by individual authors as regards quite a number of vessels.To provide just one example,in the early 30ies of the last century Guo Moruo considered a group of inscriptions(including those by Ling令)to be specimen of Cheng Wang’s time,while Tang Lan maintained the opinion that those belong to the reign of Zhao Wang.Strange enough,the discussion opened more than 70 years age is still going on.One of the obvious reasons of this situation is the fact that experts have paid little attention to the important criterion of paleography.As a result of thorough investigation of 500 selected incriptions of Western and Early Eastern Zhou,the present author established a sequence of chronological variants of 12 key graphs.This can be used as a basis for comparison with other typological criteria of dating bronze vessels.Examination of inscriptions from the point of view of paleographic regularities revealed fatal mistakes in the interpretation of calendar dates proposed in the brief report on the results of "The Xia Shang Zhou Chronology Project"(夏商周断代工程成果报告),which claimed the interpretation to be founded on typological grounds but completely ignored paleographic criterion and even tried to overcome difficulties by modifying original texts. A considerable progress has been made during recent years in the tield ot elaboration oi reliable typological technique of dating of Western Zhou bronze vessels inscriptions. Nevertheless, some problems of methodological nature still exist, causing discrepancies in opinions by individual authors as regards quite a number of vessels. To provide just one example, in the early 30ies of the last century Guo Moruo considered a group of inscriptions (including those by Ling 令) to be specimen of Cheng Wang's time, while Tang Lan maintained the opinion that those belong to the reign of Zhao Wang. Strange enough, the discussion opened more than 70 years age is still going on. One of the obvious reasons of this situation is the fact that experts have paid little attention to the important criterion of paleography. As a result of thorough investigation of 500 selected incriptions of Western and Early Eastern Zhou, the present author established a sequence of chronological variants of 12 key graphs. This can be used as a basis for comparison with other typological criteria of dating bronze vessels. Examination of inscriptions from the point of view of paleographic regularities revealed fatal mistakes in the interpretation of calendar dates proposed in the brief report on the results of "The Xia Shang Zhou Chronology Project"(夏商周断代工程成果报告), which claimed the interpretation to be founded on typological grounds but completely ignored paleographic criterion and even tried to overcome difficulties by modifying original texts.
作者 刘华夏
机构地区 台湾淡江大学
出处 《考古学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第1期43-72,共30页 Acta Archaeologica Sinica
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1唐兰.石鼓年代考[J].故宫博物院院刊,1958(1):6-36. 被引量:26
  • 2王世民.郭沫若同志与殷周铜器的考古学研究[J].考古,1982(6):610-613. 被引量:3
  • 3李学勤.《黄天树<殷墟王卜辞的分类与断代>》,《拥蟹集》,274页,三秦出版社,2000年.
  • 4李学勤.《<中国青铜器全集>序》,《拥警集》,525页,三秦出版社,2000年.
  • 5张懋镕.《金文字形书体与二十世纪的西周铜器断代研究》,《古文字研究》第26辑,188页,中华书局,2006年.
  • 6孙次舟.《虢季子白盘年代新考》[J].齐大国学季刊,1943,:16-16.
  • 7孙次舟.《虢季子白盘年代新考》[J].齐大国学季刊,1941,:20-20.
  • 8伍士谦.《微氏家族铜器群年代初探》,《古文字研究》第5辑,中华书局,1981年.
  • 9林沄.《小屯南地发掘与殷墟甲骨断代》,《古文字研究》第九辑,中华书局,1984年.
  • 10李学勤.《颂器的分合及其年代的推定》,《古文字研究》第二十六辑,中华书局,2006年

二级参考文献20

共引文献193

同被引文献225

引证文献22

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部