期刊文献+

微创单侧椎弓根经椎间孔腰椎体间融合技术在腰椎融合手术中的应用 被引量:6

Unilateral vesus bilateral minimally invasive transforaminal fixation in lumbar interbody fusion
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]研究微创单侧椎弓根经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,TLIF)的临床效果,并比较双侧椎弓根TLIF手术的术后疗效和并发症。[方法]随机选取2005年5月~2008年12月行腰椎后路融合手术40例,单侧手术组(A组)16例,其中男6例,女10例,平均年龄51.75岁。双侧手术组(B组)24例,其中男、女各12例,平均51.92岁。使用Oswestry评分,JOA评分,VAPS视觉类比评分对两组患者术前症状评分及术后疗效参数进行比较,并对两组的手术时间、出血量及融合率进行比较。[结果]单侧组与双侧组随访3~6个月,两组术前与术后3个月的Oswestry评分,JOA评分,VAPS视觉类比评分有统计学差异(P<0.05),A组术后的Oswestry评分,JOA评分,VAPS视觉类比评分与B组无统计学差异(P>0.05),两组手术时间有统计学差异,A组少于B组,两组出血量无统计学差异,两组术后3个月的融合率为100%,均无术后并发症。[结论]微创单侧椎弓根与双侧椎弓根TLIF手术均有疗效,无统计学差异。 [Objective]To compare the postoperatively clinical effects and complications between unilateral and bilateral minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF).[Methods]From May 2005 to December 2008,40 cases receviving TLIF technique were randomly divided into 2 groups.Unilateral TLIF was applied in 16 cases in group A,with 6 male,10 female,and average age of 51.75 years.Bilateral TLIF was applied in 24 cases in group B,with 12 male,12 female,and average age of 51.92 years.Pre-operative conditions and post-operative effects were compared between 2 groups with Oswestry disability index,JOA index,and VAPS index.The operation time,blood loss and healing rates were also compared.[Results]All cases were followed up for 36 months.In both of the two groups,ODI,JOA,VAPS indexes showed significant differences between pre-and 3 months post-operation(P〈0.05).Between group A and B,all postoperative indexes showed no significant difference(P〉0.05).Blood loss showed no signific...更多ant difference(P〉0.05).Operation time in group A was shorter than that in group B,with significant difference(P〈0.05).Healing rate in both two groups were 100%,with no significant difference(P〉0.05).No postoperative complication was found in two groups.[Conclusion]Unilateral TLIE technique has achieved satisfying postoperative effect compared with bilateral TLIF,with a good prospect in clinical application.
出处 《中国矫形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第3期188-191,共4页 Orthopedic Journal of China
关键词 微创 经椎间孔的腰椎体间融合术 单侧椎弓根螺钉固定 疗效 minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion unilateral pedicle screw fixation therapeutic effect.
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Johnston CE, Ashman RB, Baird AM,et al. Effect of spinal construct stiffness on early fusion mass incorporation: experimental study [ J]. Spine, 1990,15:908 - 912.
  • 2Salehi SA, Tawk R, Ganju A, et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:surgical technique and results in 24 patients[ J ]. Neurosurgery, 2004,2:368 - 374.
  • 3Yone K, Sakou T, Kawauehi Y, et al. Indication of fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients and its significance [ J ]. Spine, 1996,21:24.
  • 4Sehwender JD, Holly LT, Rouben DP, et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) :technical feasibility and initial results [ J ]. J Spinal Dissord Tech,2005,18 : 1 - 6.
  • 5Seung JH. Postoperative changes in paraspinal muscle volume:comparison between paramedian interfascial and midline approaches for lumbar fusion [ J ]. J Korean Med Sci,2007,22 : 646 - 651.
  • 6Potter BK,Freedman BA,Verwiebe EG,et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinieal and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech ,2005,4:337 -346.
  • 7Young S, Veerapen R, O'Laoire SA. Relief of lumbar canal stenosis using multilevel subarticular fenestrations as an alternative to wide laminectomy[ J]. Neurosurgery, 1988,23:628 - 633.
  • 8Frymoyer JW,McCulloch JA. Microsurgical spinal laminotomies in the adult spine : principles and practice [ M ]. New York : Raven Press Ltd, 1991.
  • 9Weiner BK, Walker M. Microdecompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis[ J]. Spine , 1999,24:2268.
  • 10Koichi I,Toshiki Y. Bilateral interlaminar fenestration and unroofing for the decompression of nerve roots by using a unilateral approach in lumbar canal stenosis[ J]. Surgical Neurology,2007,5:487 -492.

同被引文献69

  • 1姜晓幸,费琴明,王晓峰.微创TLIF手术的手术方法和早期临床结果[J].中国临床医学,2006,13(4):642-644. 被引量:14
  • 2朱若夫,杨惠林.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的临床应用进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(19):1480-1482. 被引量:9
  • 3刘耀升,陈其昕,廖胜辉,唐小君,余世策,李方财.小关节角矢状化、椎间盘退变对退变性腰椎滑移作用的有限元研究[J].国际生物医学工程杂志,2006,29(5):260-266. 被引量:9
  • 4Shono Y, Kaneda K, Aburfi K, et al. Stability of posterior spinal instrumentation and its effects on adjacent motion segments in the lumbocral spine Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 1998, 23(14):1550-1558.
  • 5Nagata H, Schendel MI, Transfeldt EE, et al. The effects of immobilization of long segments of the spine on the adjacent and distal facet force and lumbosacral rnofior Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 1993, 18(16) :2471-2479.
  • 6Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, et al. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine(Phila Pa I976), 2004, 29(17) : 1938-1944.
  • 7Mardjetko SM, Connolly PJ, Shott S. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis A meta-analysis of literature 1970-1993. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 1994, 19(20 Suppl): 2256S-2265S.
  • 8Fischgnmd JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN, et al.1997Volvo Award winner in dinical studieDegenerative lumbar spondylolisthis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study coml3anng decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instnm~ntation. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 1997, 22(24) :2807-2812.
  • 9Fischgrund JS. The argument for instrumted deeompressive posterolateral fusion for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosia Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2004, 29(2):173-174.
  • 10Schwender JD, Holly LT, Rouen DP, et al. IVfinimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interlxxty fusion(TLIF) : technical feasibility and initial re.suits. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2005, 18(Suppl) :S1-S6.

引证文献6

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部